Originally posted by Dick Gore
View Post
seriously man how can you sit where you sitting and try to convince people that they didn't just see what they just saw? how can you try and convince people that Pascal won rounds other than the first 3-4? we all saw the fight, you're just mad because you don't like Hopkins so he could have won by a crushing KO and break Jean Pascal's neck (god forbid) but you would still say something like "they put too much water on Hopkins head and body so he soaked the floor causing Pascal to slip and caused his face to come crashing on Hopkins fist" all just not to admit the real truth, you create a fantasy and run with it because there is absolutely NO WAY that Bernard didn't win the fight, the draw call was complete and utter bull****
I don't like Bernard neither, this is a well known fact about me but I was still unbiased enough to put 50$ on B-Hop to win, I literally held my biased aside in light of the greater truth which was skill wise Bernard had everything he needed to win the fight, this is FACT not something I just convinced myself to believe all because I'm an immature little piece of **** who twists and ties points to make it seem like I know a thing or two like YOU, he executed it all well too and it happened how I predicted it would I didn't act like you I left any bias out of the fight, when Pascal landed a bomb I called it and when Bernard did I called it too, that's what fans of BOXING do not fans of fighters.
Bernard won the fight, the punches did the talking. and 1 more thing how can you say it was Bernard's fault he got hit behind the head? you don't see how Pascal punches? even the announcers were saying that Pascal has a very bad tendency of hitting behind the head, he hit Bernard behind his head ILLEGALLY yet here you are saying that if anything Hopkins was doing the illegal things and Pascal did things correctly, UN be ****ing lievable..
Comment