Comments Thread For: Hauser on Mayweather-Pacquiao, Top Rank, Arum, More

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sugar Q
    Undisputed Champion
    • May 2009
    • 3384
    • 159
    • 0
    • 9,834

    #11
    My question to all the idiots on here is: IF MANNY IS AFRAID TO FIGHT MARQUEZ AGAIN WHAT MAKES YOU THINK HE WANTS TO FIGHT THE GUY MARQUEZ COULDN'T EVEN WIN A ROUND AGAINST? Face it Tards, Manny is more hype than great. The greatest thing about Manny is Top Prank's publicist.

    Comment

    • adp023
      Banned
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • May 2004
      • 942
      • 47
      • 156
      • 1,055

      #12
      "Very easily [Floyd's] lawyers could push the criminal proceedings back until the end of next year. Certainly the trial could be pushed back to the end of next year if not further. I saw recently where Richard Schaefer said it would be disrespectful to the judge if Floyd decided to not fight Manny now. But to me that’s silly. It’s no more disrespectful if he fought anybody else and if Floyd fought Manny in Las Vegas it would make the entire Nevada establishment happy and if a judge elected to office is part of Floyd’s criminal trial I’m sure he would be part of that establishment. Floyd just doesn’t want to fight him, fine." - Thomas Hauser

      Very true!! I've been saying this all along!! The court never begrudges the accused to go back to work and earn a living!! This now makes it the THIRD TIME Mayweather ducked Pacquiao!! 1) Ridiculous blood testing demands that no other boxers now or in the history of the professional sport are doing. 2) Going on "vacation" and pretending there were "no negotiations". 3) Fast-tracking his trial for beating the mother of his kids and then threatening his kids.
      Last edited by adp023; 12-03-2010, 02:10 PM.

      Comment

      • Sugar Q
        Undisputed Champion
        • May 2009
        • 3384
        • 159
        • 0
        • 9,834

        #13
        Originally posted by adp023
        "Very easily [Floyd's] lawyers could push the criminal proceedings back until the end of next year. Certainly the trial could be pushed back to the end of next year if not further. I saw recently where Richard Schaefer said it would be disrespectful to the judge if Floyd decided to not fight Manny now. But to me that’s silly. It’s no more disrespectful if he fought anybody else and if Floyd fought Manny in Las Vegas it would make the entire Nevada establishment happy and if a judge elected to office is part of Floyd’s criminal trial I’m sure he would be part of that establishment. Floyd just doesn’t want to fight him, fine." - Thomas Hauser

        Very true!! I've been saying this all along!! The court never begrudges the accused to go back to work and earn a living!! This now makes it the THIRD TIME Mayweather ducked Pacquiao!! 1) Ridiculous blood testing demands that no other boxers now or in the history of the professional sport are doing. 2) Going on "vacation" and pretending there were "no negotiations". 3) Fast-tracking his trial for beating the mother of his kids and then threatening his kids.

        You believe that because your not very intelligent. If the money that the fight will generate has that much power (like BA is saying) why not use it to have the case dismissed altogether? Why take a fight for the sake of taking it when you can use it on your behalf. Postponing the case throws out the chance of using it in regards to Floyd's pending case. Only a complete dumbass would do such a thing. I think Floyd is going to shock many when he announces a fight with Martinez @ 155. Manny isn't going anywhere unless Shane smashes his ass if they fight. Martinez is the man to beat.
        Last edited by Sugar Q; 12-03-2010, 02:20 PM.

        Comment

        • The Gambler1981
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2008
          • 25961
          • 520
          • 774
          • 49,039

          #14
          It is funny that he is a Bob Arum apologist~ considering how much he nit picks on everyone else and their issues.

          Comment

          • SceneSpectator!
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 1986
            • 39
            • 0
            • 8,197

            #15
            Originally posted by el rey
            All I read was " blah blah Arum pays me...blah blah, so I have to talk good about him blah blah he's the best promoter ever....blah blah do I get my paycheck now Bobby, wanna see how deep Pac's nutz can go in my mouth?, blah blah "
            Just feel sorry, this writer just not fit your interst of not glamorizing your idol floyd. Find your luck to the next writer posting pro-*****s!

            Comment

            • The Gambler1981
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2008
              • 25961
              • 520
              • 774
              • 49,039

              #16
              Originally posted by SceneSpectator!
              Just feel sorry, this writer just not fit your interst of not glamorizing your idol floyd. Find your luck to the next writer posting pro-*****s!
              It's not that, it is that he is critical of one side while completely lapping up what the other has to say.

              If he cast the same eye on all no one could fault him.

              It is not about views it is a matter of consistency.

              Comment

              • The Big Dunn
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2009
                • 69275
                • 9,488
                • 7,834
                • 287,568

                #17
                Floyd agrees to contractual terms in January, writers like Hauser say he doesn't want fight. He tries to do a deal with King last week, they say he still doesn't want fight.

                Larry Merchant, Max Kellerman, and plenty other TV guys ask Manny do you want to giht floyd next and Manny sayd "ask my promoter its up to him." Those same writers say Manny wants the fight.

                Thomas Hauser is an excellent writer and devoted boxing journalist. He can hate floyd and respect Manny all he wants but that doesn't make Manny want this fight.

                Just ask yourself who has more to lose?

                Comment

                • ModernTalking
                  Cuckold **** Connoisseur
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 6621
                  • 272
                  • 0
                  • 13,009

                  #18
                  Originally posted by flint
                  had manny pacquiao just agreed to the testing in the beginning.he wouls've already had is aa whoopped.floyd agreed to the money, gloves,ring size,weight stipulation and venue.all he asked for was the testing and pac screwed everything up with his excuses.its just that simple and plain.
                  You mean we would have seen Floyd go on vacatin sooner haha.

                  Comment

                  • jbpanama
                    Big Floyd Fan
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 8075
                    • 107
                    • 0
                    • 20,919

                    #19
                    FLINTO, U got to get up to SPEED; the
                    MASTER of AVOIDANCE, Had A PLAN B,
                    ready if
                    TESTING SMOKE SCREEN Failed!
                    It's apparent, BOY wants no part of Pac,
                    and will keep on PUNKING OUT!!!

                    Comment

                    • SceneSpectator!
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 1986
                      • 39
                      • 0
                      • 8,197

                      #20
                      Originally posted by The Gambler1981
                      It's not that, it is that he is critical of one side while completely lapping up what the other has to say.

                      If he cast the same eye on all no one could fault him.

                      It is not about views it is a matter of consistency.
                      You can not fault at the writer, he's just saying the views of Mr. Hauser and that's the job of the writer.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP