I'm wondering what you guys think about this? I think the consensus amongst boxing pundits is that George Foreman had two primes in his career.
Some analysts would argue that Foreman was more mature, tougher, and a smarter boxer in his second prime than he was in his first. Others would argue that Foreman was meaner, punched harder, was more ferocious, and ultimately better in his first prime.
Moreover, anyway you look at it, Holyfield beat a very formitable opponent in George Foreman and that win goes down as one of his greatest performances in the ring. I believe that Holyfield beat a "best prime" Foreman and had he fought a younger Foreman he probably would have dominated him even more so.
What do you guys think? The Foreman threads never get old!
Some analysts would argue that Foreman was more mature, tougher, and a smarter boxer in his second prime than he was in his first. Others would argue that Foreman was meaner, punched harder, was more ferocious, and ultimately better in his first prime.
Moreover, anyway you look at it, Holyfield beat a very formitable opponent in George Foreman and that win goes down as one of his greatest performances in the ring. I believe that Holyfield beat a "best prime" Foreman and had he fought a younger Foreman he probably would have dominated him even more so.
What do you guys think? The Foreman threads never get old!
Foreman is on record as saying that he used to be really tensed up!!! He used to get really mad thinking about how his opponent was going to try to break his nose and whatnot before the start of the fight!!!
Comment