Pacquiao + Mayweather= Juan Manuel Marquez

[Bastian Loc]

The difference is,

Terrible actually beat Pacquiao, decisively even, after a career of going through wars.

The difference is,

Morales always was, always has been and always will be the fighter with the better legacy.

The difference is,

Morales didn't turn down fights and then cry about not getting his turn. He took his opportunities when they were there instead of being a stubborn dumbass and getting peanuts to take a loss.

Marquez is older than him and has been in just as many tough fights, so sorry that's not gonna cut it here.

Morales is fighting bums and wishing he could fight Marquez right now, so no, he's not the better fighter and doesn't have a better legacy.

He'll be remembered for losing to Barrera 2x and quitting 2x against Pac and

losing to Zaheer Rahim.




That guy couldn't do anything past 130, JMM is dominating fighters that would've kicked his ass.

[Vasyl’s dad]

Marquez is older than him and has been in just as many tough fights, so sorry that's not gonna cut it here.

Morales is fighting bums and wishing he could fight Marquez right now, so no, he's not the better fighter and doesn't have a better legacy.

He'll be remembered for losing to Barrera 2x and quitting 2x against Pac and

losing to Zaheer Rahim.




That guy couldn't do anything past 130, JMM is dominating fighters that would've kicked his ass.

You can keep lying to yourself if it helps you sleep better at night.


and you know you seriously don't want to compare the resumes.

[Frogs!]

in related news, the atlanta falcons got away with 1 today when the refs appear to have missed a call late in the game.

we should egg the packer players to wear t-shirts that read...

'we beat the falcons today. we both should be 8-3'

[Bastian Loc]

You can keep lying to yourself if it helps you sleep better at night.


and you know you seriously don't want to compare the resumes.

Maybe not as tough because Marquez was too good to fight like an idiot.

But resume wise its not even close, especially after what he did with Katsidis last night.

Go ahead and post that he beat Zaragoza and quit 2x against Pacquiao.

[joseph5620]

Not entirely true, I've seen it said about Chavez too.

"He ducked Frankie Randall for a 3rd bout".
How do you duck someone you fought twice?

When you get a gift technical decision and quit like Chavez did that night, there should have been an immediate rubber match. Not years later in a meaningless fight when both were over 40 and shot.

[dyu]

Hes top 50 ATG.

True Story.

He had a phenomenal lightweight run.
Casamayor
Juan Diaz
Katsidis

Marquez looked good on all those fights with all GBP fighters.

[cupocity303]

JMM is a precise puncher and his timing is great, great at recovering also.


But his footwork is sloppy and he has no upper body defense. He looks like he has a ton of ***** bricks in his trunks the way he hops back and forth all the time.


The better title of this thread is Pacquiao + JMM = Mayweather. He has the technical abilities of Marquez (and then some) and he is on the hand speed & conditioning level of a Pacquiao.

[Frogs!]

JMM is a precise puncher and his timing is great, great at recovering also.


But his footwork is ****ty and he has no upper body defense. He looks like he has a ton of ***** bricks in his trunks the way he hops back and forth all the time.


The better title of this thread is Pacquiao + JMM = Mayweather. He has the technical abilities of Marquez (and then some) and he is on the hand speed & conditioning level of a Pacquiao.

yeah but your version would fall short of the purpose of this thread which is to annoint jmm as the 2nd coming of christ.

at least in this thread.

prepare to be rebuked!

[_original_]

Nobody in the game throws more text book perfect punches than Marquez, it's like watching an old master at work.

[STRUGG]

Mayweather should not be mentioned with the likes.............of PAC and JMM...............PBF aint got ****e....................compared with PAC and JMM......................