Frochs resume is definitely better than floyd....
Collapse
-
Comment
-
In the past 3 years Froch has a better resume. Froch has had over double the fights Floyd has since December 2007.
But obviously career for career Floyd has a better resume than Froch.Comment
-
Comment
-
I'm a big big Froch fan (I went to university in Nottingham and whilst I was there I went to see him fight and went over to his gym) but IMO this thread is ridiculous.
Floyd's win over a prime, undefeated and P4P top-10 (at the time) Diego Corrales is better than anything on Froch's resume.
Floyd was one of the best Super-Featherweights of all time.
If Froch wins the Super-6 and defeats Bute, then he has a case for being the Super-Middleweight GOAT.
Floyd (an ATG) > Froch (who hasn't even reached the status of 'future hall of famer')Comment
-
HeHe
Floyd is a WW so probably not buddy. Honestly Floyd probably does beat AA in a UD even giving up 20lbs. AA is not exactly boxing royalty but he is tough and hits hard
Floyd was destin for greatness before Froch was ever a factor. And will somebody please tell Froch's fans that Dirrel was robbed. The only thing I like about Froch is his attitude in the ring. I wish more fighters had that.Last edited by studentofthegam; 01-16-2011, 08:42 PM.Comment
-
Comment

Comment