Chavez is not the greatest Mexican fighter...Salvador Sanchez is..

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • scap
    Boxingscene's *****
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2004
    • 7226
    • 385
    • 1
    • 17,023

    #41
    Originally posted by jabsRstiff
    Wilfred Benitez accomplished more than Sanchez did by age 23....so did Tyson.

    Benitez was also kinda shot by the time he was in his mid-twenties.
    Age in boxing is more than your years on earth.

    Xcaret....

    I thought Salvador Sanchez was a great fighter....but IMO he is overrated NOW,that's what untimely death's can do to one's legend.

    the three posters who voted "they both suck"....
    total douchebags.
    Super point, death can make you an even bigger legend than you are.

    Imagine if Tyson would have been killed after he ko'd Spinks, **** the guy would be considered right there with Ali and by many he would be rated the greatest HW ever!

    Imagine if HEctor Camacho Jr. would have been killed prior to his fight with Jesse James, so he may not be considered a legend but at least he wouldnt be considered a *****.

    Nice post, death at an early age is like miracle grow for your legacy.

    Comment

    • jabsRstiff
      ! ! ! !
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jun 2004
      • 8964
      • 498
      • 136
      • 16,167

      #42
      Originally posted by xKillingJokex
      You know my vote already..Sanchez..stop the hating on this guy..hes not overrated..yeah he fought down to the level of his competition. Dont try to downgrade his victory against Gomez..cause he didnt "trained" properly for the fight or he wasnt anything special at 126. I dont see anyone bringing up the fact that Carlos Zarate went up in weight to fight Gomez..but yet people say that was a great win for Gomez..which is true to an extent. Zarate wasnt anything special at super bantamweight. So, Sanchez beat Gomez, Nelson, Laporte, Codwell and Lopez (2x). At only 23..not in his prime..yes i think its fair that he would of gotten better..and would have accomplished more.

      Please don't include me as a "hater".
      I said I thought he was great...

      As for his fight with Gomez. He squashed Gomez...& would have done it again in a rematch. But, that fight is an example of the kind of fight/fighter Sanchez needed to shine.
      When faced with other boxers, Sanchez struggled. It wasn't that he was fighting down to the level of his comp, every time he looked bad...he had trouble when he couldn't counter a guy to death.
      Do I sound like a "hater", or a guy who actually witnessed this dude in his prime ?

      Comment

      • xKillingJokex
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • May 2005
        • 237
        • 19
        • 4
        • 6,547

        #43
        Originally posted by jabsRstiff
        Please don't include me as a "hater".
        I said I thought he was great...

        As for his fight with Gomez. He squashed Gomez...& would have done it again in a rematch. But, that fight is an example of the kind of fight/fighter Sanchez needed to shine.
        When faced with other boxers, Sanchez struggled. It wasn't that he was fighting down to the level of his comp, every time he looked bad...he had trouble when he couldn't counter a guy to death.
        Do I sound like a "hater", or a guy who actually witnessed this dude in his prime ?
        I didnt call u a hater.just saying the hating on this guy by some ppl is..crazy..but you say he struggled, which he did, against boxers. Did he look bad? No i dont think so cause he WON the fights. Look at the big fights that this guy had..he rose up and fight great. I mean he knocked out Nelson, Lopez, and Gomez. I mean..that has to count for something. Of course he would struggle more against boxers bcause he was a great counter puncher. Its easier to counter punch someone thats coming forward aggressivly.

        Comment

        • jabsRstiff
          ! ! ! !
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2004
          • 8964
          • 498
          • 136
          • 16,167

          #44
          Originally posted by xKillingJokex
          I didnt call u a hater.just saying the hating on this guy by some ppl is..crazy..but you say he struggled, which he did, against boxers. Did he look bad? No i dont think so cause he WON the fights. Look at the big fights that this guy had..he rose up and fight great. I mean he knocked out Nelson, Lopez, and Gomez. I mean..that has to count for something. Of course he would struggle more against boxers bcause he was a great counter puncher. Its easier to counter punch someone thats coming forward aggressivly.

          Well, people always point out Chavez having trouble with slick boxers.
          Uhhhh...Pernell Whitaker is the slickest boxer since Willie Pep.
          The Meldrick Taylor who pushed Chavez to the limit was an AWESOME fighter.....
          These fights, against the lb4lb ELITE are always being held against Chavez...& that's bull****.

          Comment

          • xKillingJokex
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • May 2005
            • 237
            • 19
            • 4
            • 6,547

            #45
            Originally posted by jabsRstiff
            Well, people always point out Chavez having trouble with slick boxers.
            Uhhhh...Pernell Whitaker is the slickest boxer since Willie Pep.
            The Meldrick Taylor who pushed Chavez to the limit was an AWESOME fighter.....
            These fights, against the lb4lb ELITE are always being held against Chavez...& that's bull****.
            I dont hold that against Chavez. He fought some awesome boxers like a Whitaker and Taylor. Chavez was a straight ahead fighter who didnt mind taking punches as long as he got his in. I never liked Whitaker cause he pitter patter punches didnt do much for me. People who hold that against Chavez..just dont like him for one reason or another . And more reasons not to like him , they take.

            Comment

            • IwatchBoxing
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2004
              • 10527
              • 235
              • 403
              • 11,555

              #46
              Originally posted by xKillingJokex
              I dont hold that against Chavez. He fought some awesome boxers like a Whitaker and Taylor. Chavez was a straight ahead fighter who didnt mind taking punches as long as he got his in. I never liked Whitaker cause he pitter patter punches didnt do much for me. People who hold that against Chavez..just dont like him for one reason or another . And more reasons not to like him , they take.
              He fought LaPorte, Miguel Ruiz, Frankie Randall,DLH too, other than Taylor and Whitaker...

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP