Originally posted by periks19
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Marquez: 'I Want Pacquiao, Khan, Morales; Not Guerrero'
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Mayas View PostSoto is a vicious body-puncher.
Pac and Floyd dont know how to attack Marquez' body the way Soto can.
Comment
-
Originally posted by periks19 View Postwtf is up with all these ****ing haters hating on JMM not wanting to fight soto, guerrero etc. JMM is looking for big paydays and he sure as hell ****ing deserves it he has been ruling all the 3 weight divisions hes been in. at his age i don't judge him wanting big paydays and if there is a boxer that deserves going for big paydays instead of hard fights is marquez cause he already had those hard fights.
I mean if *******s and casual boxing fans are ok with pac supposedly the #1 p4p taking on shot boxers for big paydays wtf is wrong with marquez doing the same specially on his age
Comment
-
-
I'd be way more interested in JMM-Khan by far. Hopefully Khan don't price himself out again if the fight is back on the table.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rican411 View PostJMM doesn't want to lose to a up and coming boxer, he doesn't want Guerrerro or Lopez, whats new, only Khan? Morales? Pacman? Way to cherry pick LOL lets not forget Maya and Humberto Soto LOL
He is not some green prospect that has to prove himself.
He is a faded legend who was a career featherweight, he can do whatever the *** he wants, without question.
Every single fighter that you mentioned, except Manny, will most likely not achieve what JMM has in boxing..... so your post does not make much sense.
Your job is to show him some respect, and to pay him what he is worth to watch him dismantle the beast Katsidis. And don't forget to thank him once the fight is over.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LeadUppercut View PostBecause he's not some dumb kid.
He is not some green prospect that has to prove himself.
He is a faded legend who was a career featherweight, he can do whatever the *** he wants, without question.
Every single fighter that you mentioned, except Manny, will most likely not achieve what JMM has in boxing..... so your post does not make much sense.
Your job is to show him some respect, and to pay him what he is worth to watch him dismantle the beast Katsidis. And don't forget to thank him once the fight is over.Juanma is just not as good as they make him into.
Comment
-
Originally posted by raiden10 View PostHE beat Pac twice? where marquez kiss canvas 4 times when they fought 1st fight he got florred 3 times and 1 on the judge admit he make mistake of scoring in favor of pacquiao! pac beat marquez twice in close fight. I f marquez will fight pac @ 147lb he better sign his will and life insurance
Since when is boxing called knock down? JMM clealry outboxed Pac in at least 17 rounds out of 24 rounds.
Comment
-
Originally posted by periks19 View Postyeah and because this sport is called knockdowns right??? last time i checked this sport is called boxing. JMM outlanded pac in every single category in both fights he outboxed him in both fights nearly every single boxing write espn, yahoo, etc had JMM winning the second fight except the judges.
I wonder why did pavlik lost against martinez he got robbed right because he dropped martinez lmaol. I mean next time a fighter falls down to the canvas might as well just end the fight since knockdowns win the fights right??? anybody that doesn't truly see that marquez should of won the second fight either are *******s, JMM haters or like you that think this is all about knockdowns and don't know a damn thing about the sport of boxing. I don't blame JMM being bitter about the loss but he should blame the corrupt judges who always **** up fights and come with shady ass decisions.
I mean look at round #8 on the second fight that **** is way more impressive than all 4 knockdowns pac had that round shows how much superior JMM was as a boxer than pacquiao.
Its not always about boxing vs being a bomber, i have to agree that an offensive fighter has bigger drawbacks when facing a counter puncher. That said you can proclaim whatever you wish about "its about boxing and being a pure boxer" as much as you wish. But even if a prime JMM took on Pac at each of their best weights, it would be Pac @ 144 vs a 134 JMM and the result would b a given.
In the end Pac's popularity has been due to his consistently strong performance against solid opposition; no one was thinking Barrera or Morales was declining either before or during their initial bouts with Pac, Hatton fought at his best weight division where he was undefeated [keeping in mind he lost to Floyd when facing him in the WW division], Cotto was still considered a bigger guy who could win if he could get him on the ropes and Margarito was expected to loose but not the way we thought he would.
Since you've never picked up the glove it looks like, knockdowns don't win fights, but stop whining like Floy-rant proclaiming boxing is broke because of it. Its not like knockdowns occur easily and knockdowns partially gauge the ability of the boxers on both ends. You may not like it and you seem bitter about it. But grow up already and stop being a a friggin Pac hater for whatever reason. Hey Floyd lost his first bout to Castillo, Pac should've won the first bout and loose the second on points, Hagler should've won over Leonard and Malignaggi should've won the first bout with Diaz. So ***** and moan how much you want. If you want to look at those 2 bouts and somehow transplant it to all of boxing, you seriously have issues. The way I look at it, if the first bout went to Pac, there wouldn't have been a second and that's that really.
Comment
Comment