Why does Pacquiao mostly face fighters coming off a LOSS?

[Heeb]

...and the award for least original thread goes to

[-MAKAVELLI-]

Campbell, Raheem, and even Forbes are all better than David Diaz, Singsurat, and Torrecampo, what does that say idiot

so he names PAC opponents from 20 years ago and David Diaz



what a clown

[$tate of Mind]

I'm not a ******* or ***** you d*ck riding f*ggot...I'm a boxing fan thru and thru. I'm tired of people like u and versatility that do nothing but trash fighters, albeit famous, successful or not, and their fans. You guys are the epitome of trolls on the net

Yeah because we point out the truth, your no true boxing fan if you choose to turn a blind eye to Pacquiao's bull isshhh.......

[$tate of Mind]

so he names PAC opponents from 20 years ago and David Diaz



what a clown

Gotcha *******, easy work you've been served yet again!

[one_two_puncher]

its well documented pacquiao fights losers

morales lost to raheem, pacquiao fought morales and ducked raheem in the past

margarito lost to mosley, pacquiao fought margarito and ducked mosley in the past

cotto lost to margarito, pacquiao fought cotto at a catch weight 145, and only fought margarito later after margarito lost to mosley and was shot to bits at a catch weight of 150

now they want to fight mosley who lost to floyd and almost lost to mora.

the catchweight king simply wont fight winners.

he fought hatton shortly after hatton lost to mayweather

he fought morales each time when morales was coming off a loss

he fought clottey when clottey lost to cotto, and pacquiao had already dominated a plaster damaged version of cotto at a freaking catch weight, but still he fought clottey.


its a pattern here that the PEDuiao wont fight winners. I bet pacquiao may fight paul williams now after Martinez knocked him the **** out.

maybe it's because he came from a lower weight class, he is testing himself in that new weight. It wouldn't be the smartest thing to move up in weight and challenge the best in that division right away. And it's not like the fighters he fought were nobody's, he fought great fighters, he proved that he can fight up to welterweight. and now that he has found his comfort zone which is in WW. Now he can challenge anybody

[Versatility]

that's not even worth the words TBH


BTW- speaking of disgrace, how's that list coming along?

so far we have

Nate Campbell
Zahir Raheem




need help?


i'll throw another one in there for you; Stevie Forbes



poser

mak, i have a question for you.

can you name one fighter in the last 6 years that pacquiao has beaten who:

- didn't lose his previous 7 or 8 fights before facing pacquiao
- wasn't involved in a catch weight
- was in his prime

[Heeb]

Gotcha *******, easy work you've been served yet again!

[bigsmoothh]

[QUOTE=FootWork777;9646631]Because he's a media generated hype sensation, who is truly a bonafide cherry picker, this is the flat out truth.......[/QUO



i agree with this. its sad but its the truth. real boxing fans will eventually see it.

[$tate of Mind]

whats the reason why floyd ask manny to do additional drug test?

What relevance does this have to the thread?

[-MAKAVELLI-]

Gotcha *******, easy work you've been served yet again!