sergio should be p4p #1? give me a break. how many people on his resume have you really even heard of?
i do think he should be p4p #3, and hes a FANTASTIC fighter - i really like the guy i hope he continues on the path hes going, but to say he should be p4p #1 is pure idiocy and seems like a pac-hating thread.
pacs resume:
barrera
morales
marquez
de la hoya
hatton
cotto
clottey
margarito
sergio should be p4p #1? give me a break. how many people on his resume have you really even heard of?
i do think he should be p4p #3, and hes a FANTASTIC fighter - i really like the guy i hope he continues on the path hes going, but to say he should be p4p #1 is pure idiocy and seems like a pac-hating thread.
pacs resume:
barrera
morales
marquez
de la hoya
hatton
cotto
clottey
margarito
sergio should be p4p #1? give me a break. how many people on his resume have you really even heard of?
i do think he should be p4p #3, and hes a FANTASTIC fighter - i really like the guy i hope he continues on the path hes going, but to say he should be p4p #1 is pure idiocy and seems like a pac-hating thread.
pacs resume:
barrera
morales
marquez
de la hoya
hatton
cotto
clottey
margarito
martinez:
williams
pavlik
cintron
not even remotely close at all
pac resume has knockouts by 2 bums, a CLEAR loss to morales and 1-2 losses to marquez(everyone knows what went down was pure robbery). The only win worthy of admiration where his previous opponet hadnt just got clobbered is barrera
Comment