Juan Manuel Marquez VS. Manny Pacquiao WHO YOU THINK WON THE FIGHT??

[JoartCC]

well ****, that sounded real smart! you sound like a little pretentious turd thats just begging for a beatdown at the hands of a mexican or puertorican!!

your a tool dude, "blundering" hahahaaaaa "your arguments are blundered" hahahahahahahahahahaaaa - too ****en predictable

Hahaha! Check the past threads and you will see I easily squash arguments like yours. It holds no basis, no evidence, no nothing.

That is why guys like you baya constantly eat their words. Because what you have are mere opinions without basis.

[baya]

Hahaha! Check the past threads and you will see I easily squash arguments like yours. It holds no basis, no evidence, no nothing.

That is why guys like you baya constantly eat their words. Because what you have are mere opinions without basis.

actually, i don't eat my words, that much - you haven't been here enough time like these other guys to witness it, its been a couple times yeah ... it sucks when you lose

but i'll never take an L to you fruitcake. you come on here because you guys have a ****en indio who beat 2 mexicans and who, as u ignorantly state - has surpassed duran in the P4P rankings ... yeah, whos the one w/ "mere opinions without basis" **** turd.

[ReadyUp]

Hahaha! Check the past threads and you will see I easily squash arguments like yours. It holds no basis, no evidence, no nothing.

That is why guys like you baya constantly eat their words. Because what you have are mere opinions without basis.

Haha.

The basis of this non-opinion really boils down to the logic of the actual fight, I consistently discredit your inconsistent replys with my supremely evident boxing knowledge that was percieved as incompetent but garnered truthful existence from viewing countless hours of Pacquiao footage.
It is truly argumentative that you would even have the audacity to comprehend what is an opinion and what is factual, E=Mc2 in a court of law, one nation, in divisible, I have a dream.

THE FIGHT WAS A DRAW.
Thank you.

[JoartCC]

actually, i don't eat my words, that much - you haven't been here enough time like these other guys to witness it, its been a couple times yeah ... it sucks when you lose

but i'll never take an L to you fruitcake. you come on here because you guys have a ****en indio who beat 2 mexicans and who, as u ignorantly state - has surpassed duran in the P4P rankings ... yeah, whos the one w/ "mere opinions without basis" **** turd.

Whatever baya. Your opinions without basis holds no ground whatsoever in comparison to my evidence. A judge admitting his guilt in national tv.

So before you try to make pertinent arguments (I doubt if you can make one), make sure you have your solid basis to lean on.

Right now, you're standing on paper posts.

[JoartCC]

Haha.

The basis of this non-opinion really boils down to the logic of the actual fight, I consistently discredit your inconsistent replys with my supremely evident boxing knowledge that was percieved as incompetent but garnered truthful existence from viewing countless hours of Pacquiao footage.
It is truly argumentative that you would even have the audacity to comprehend what is an opinion and what is factual, E=Mc2 in a court of law, one nation, in divisible, I have a dream.

THE FIGHT WAS A DRAW.
Thank you.

Logic without basis and evidence is nothing but just a mere opinion glodenboy. When will you ever learn the basics of debates. Well, I'll teach you.

Claiming something without presenting your basis or evidence is nothing more than mere whining and it all amounts to nothing and your opinions are basically worthless.

How do you beat a confession made by the judge on national tv that he made a "mistake"?

Of course you don't. lol!

Unless you're the judge himself.

[baya]

Whatever baya. Your opinions without basis holds no ground whatsoever in comparison to my evidence. A judge admitting his guilt in national tv.

So before you try to make pertinent arguments (I doubt if you can make one), make sure you have your solid basis to lean on.

Right now, you're standing on paper posts.

paper posts, as opposed to whaaaat ... you do? i envision you as a pinoy w/ a cow-lick and pocket protector and glasses who now has a hero in pac and whos balls have now dropped because of it - how far off am i?

be honest. you know **** about boxing as a whole, i mean .. i saw yesterday you posted "raheem has no chin" .. totally baseless and can't be substantiated, so don't tell me about my arguments and my posts man, your critiquing can be hurtful, you piece of ****

[JoartCC]

paper posts, as opposed to whaaaat ... you do? i envision you as a pinoy w/ a cow-lick and pocket protector and glasses who now has a hero in pac and whos balls have now dropped because of it - how far off am i?

be honest. you know **** about boxing as a whole, i mean .. i saw yesterday you posted "raheem has no chin" .. totally baseless and can't be substantiated, so don't tell me about my arguments and my posts man, your critiquing can be hurtful, you piece of ****

lol! Now you resort to name-calling and lame insults? lol! Very typical of your race anyway baya. So I'll just ignore it. It runs witht the whole country, that's the saying.

Your opinions without basis are nothing and worthless.

I have on my side, a solid confession of guilt.

[ReadyUp]

Logic without basis and evidence is nothing but just a mere opinion glodenboy. When will you ever learn the basics of debates. Well, I'll teach you.

Claiming something without presenting your basis or evidence is nothing more than mere whining and it all amounts to nothing and your opinions are basically worthless.

How do you beat a confession made by the judge on national tv that he made a "mistake"?

Of course you don't. lol!

Unless you're the judge himself.

Your making the opinion. Regardless or not what the judge said,
The fight stands. It was declared a DRAW.

I'm not claiming this, I'm not making an opinion, the only evidence I need is the actual fight.

The scorecards read:

115-110 for Pacquiao; John Stewart
115-100 for Marquez; Guy Jutras
113-113 a DRAW; Burt Clements

That is my evidence. And it stands to this day.

The fight IS A DRAW.

[JoartCC]

Your making the opinion. Regardless or not what the judge said,
The fight stands. It was declared a DRAW.

I'm not claiming this, I'm not making an opinion, the only evidence I need is the actual fight.

The scorecards read:

115-110 for Pacquiao; John Stewart
115-100 for Marquez; Guy Jutras
113-113 a DRAW; Burt Clements

That is my evidence. And it stands to this day.

The fight IS A DRAW.

The evidence is marred by controversy.

And that evidence is overturned by a confession made by one of the judges. What you have is a mere prima facie evidence to show your basis.

Your prima facie evidence was quickly overturned by the confession of guilt by one of the judges. So it means, your evidence is... sad to say, worth nothing.

[ReadyUp]

The evidence is marred by controversy.

And that evidence is overturned by a confession made by one of the judges. What you have is a mere prima facie evidence to show your basis.

Your prima facie evidence was quickly overturned by the confession of guilt by one of the judges. So it means, your evidence is... sad to say, worth nothing.

No, the fight was not overturned. My evidence stands as corrected.


And what the hell was up with your "Zahir Raheem has a glass chin" comment? Typical of a person who doesn't know fighters but quick to speak on them.