Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Floyd Mayweather Jr. is Annoyed With Pacquiao Critcs

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Reloaded View Post
    How about Mannyipulater just take the fricken test!!
    How about Mr.Boatbuyer just drop his demand for a test?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by pistol whip View Post
      How about Mr.Boatbuyer just drop his demand for a test?
      How about Manny just take it?

      Comment


      • Manny agreed to 7 days supposedly. Greenburg attests that it was floyd who ran away and Shaffer commented on pacs willingness to take the tests. Al Haymon was a part of the negotiations and his silence tells us the story because he can say nothing to defend his friend and client. Neither can Elerbe who denied the negotiations completely for what ever reason, most likely being a unfavorable one for Floyd's image. Floyd who is always yappin hasn't denied Manny's claims that he agreed to everything, which is what the media has banked on as evidence of Floyd's cowardice nor has he refuted Koncz who said it was a 7 day cut off which is a very acceptable compromise for assuring that both fighters are clean as Conte said 14 was good enough and was accepted by most as such back then. The point here is to address the concerns of Floyd and Manny. Floyd thinks it is a risk to go in the ring with a Ped user and Manny thinks it is a risk to go in the ring having been tested too close to the fight. 7 days answers those concerns. Why Floyd does not approve that, I don't know but it tells me and everyone he don't want the fight.

        The facts are these though:
        *Greenburg has gone public saying there were negotiations and suggested floyd ducked.
        *Shaffer suggested that Pac is willing to test,
        * Pac said he agreed to everything,
        * Koncz said it was agreed to with a 7 day cut off.

        Vs.
        The lack of defense for an otherwise vocal person.
        * The silence of Al Haymon,
        *The silence of Floyd himself in denying what has caused him criticism (the acceptance of Manny of tests),
        *and Elerbe's denial.
        What caused their silence and denial? was it unfavorable for floyds image to speak on it with the true facts of the negotiations?

        *****s wonder why people are critical of Floyd, call him a ducker, a coward but facts are facts and opinions are opinions. People see the facts of the evidence and weigh them and it is highly unfavorable for floyd right now. Even his father, who's word has become ***** gospel has gone totally to fantasy land in his last interview tirade. *****s, im sorry but you guys really, really, really are out of touch with reality.
        Last edited by Alibata; 11-19-2010, 01:29 PM.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by GRUSTLER View Post
          There was plenty of time to make Mosley/Pacquiao after Mosley
          beat Margarito. Mosley was chasing Manny all last year. The
          Berto/Mosley fight was suppsoed to be in January 2010 if I'm not
          mistaken.

          Shane fought Margarito on January 24, 2009.

          Cotto fought Clottey on June 13, 2009

          Pacquiao fought Cotto on November 14, 2009

          That WHOLE TIME Manny Pacquiao was in a position
          to negotiate a fight with Mosley but Roach said Mosley
          was too good, not a big enough draw and that he wasn't
          Oscar. AND Roach said that Mosley would be Pacquiao
          toughest fight out of Cotto and Mayweather. Your talking
          about titles? Cotto won Paul Williams WBO, vacantly fighting
          Michael Jennings, while Mosley TKO'd Margarito, who TKO'd
          Cotto for his title. Which fight makes the most sense for the P4P
          king Manny Pacquiao? Mosley was top dawg. Pacquiao could
          have made that fight happen if he wanted to. All I know is
          Shane tried to......
          Manny was set to fight hatton at 140lbs in may 2009 so your timeline is a bit misleading. From what I recall mosley was an option after manny beat hatton. So like I said if it was between cotto and mosley, cotto was the more attractive fight for the reasons I mentioned. And I wasn't talking belts but merely stating one of the reasons cotto was an option for manny. If he had fought mosley instead people would be *****ing he dint fight cotto.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Vader21 View Post
            First round of negotiations it was mannys fault for not taking the test. Second time he agrees and floyd still playing games. It's up to floyd to man up now.
            Ok fair enough. But why are so many people saying Floyd
            ducked Manny? When Manny was the one who backed out
            before? I really hope and wish that this fight happens next
            year so we can all stop debating this over drawn topic. I
            wish Manny and Floyd would just make this fight to spare
            us the constant news about this happening. LETS DO IT.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Vader21 View Post
              Also, I don't think the fight gets made after floyd saw manny vs margarito. Margs was a guy floyd waqnted no part of and to see manny weigh 17 lbs less than Margs and still destroy probably made floyd extend his time off from boxing.
              Then why did he fight Shane after witnessing a worse demolition of Margarito " a guy he wanted no part of?" I hate ppl who started watching fights two weeks ago and are trying to act as though they're seasoned historians.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Vader21 View Post
                Manny was set to fight hatton at 140lbs in may 2009 so your timeline is a bit misleading. From what I recall mosley was an option after manny beat hatton. So like I said if it was between cotto and mosley, cotto was the more attractive fight for the reasons I mentioned. And I wasn't talking belts but merely stating one of the reasons cotto was an option for manny. If he had fought mosley instead people would be *****ing he dint fight cotto.
                I think Cotto was more of an option for Pacquiao than Mosley
                was because Top Rank wanted it that way. Mosley was coming
                off and impressive win and Cotto struggled pass Clottey. A Mosley
                win at that time would have been a bigger achievment for Manny
                at the time because everyone already said Cotto wasn't the same a
                fter Margarito. To be more specific. Roach said it himself about
                Cotto while he said Mosley was a bigger threat. You tell me which
                fight would have been more meaningful for Pac?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by GRUSTLER View Post
                  Pac could have fought Cotto at 147 where Cotto won the title.
                  Cotto was the champ and Manny made a reluctant Cotto put
                  his title on the line and Manny was the challenger? Why would
                  they do that if it didn't matter at 145? Manny fought De La Hoya
                  at 147 and not Cotto? Then he fought Clottey at 147? What
                  part of the game is that? Roach already said Cotto was damaged
                  goods? Why go for the weight? The funny thing is that Manny
                  has gooned De La Hoya, Hatton, Cotto and Margarito into everything
                  he wants but Pac can't do a random blood tests? That's bull****.


                  Like I said, the weight favored manny but not enough to try to discredit his win which a lot of people like to do. Not just with him but every boxer. Its actually one of the things I dislike about boxing fans. For exqample, at the time of manny vs oscar it was suppose to be a mismatch for oscar, manny can't win etc. Manny wins and now its weight drained oscar, shot oscar, etc.

                  Manny agreed to floyds demand 2nd time around, its up to floyd to make the fight.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Ko King 212 View Post
                    I think he is doing a terrible job by not saying nothing. I just dont get why dont he say I want manny to agree to the test all the way up to the fight or simply say I want(or dont want it).

                    As a floys fan he annoys the f-ck out of me. no bull****.
                    Dude, if your a really a fan and not a Pac-roaches disguised as a Floyd fan u would kno he said it many times. These people just don't care how he loses as long as he does...if Pac was to take a baseball bat in the ring and clubber Floyd they would still praise PAC and say Floyd was foolish not to bring one also.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Vader21 View Post
                      Like I said, the weight favored manny but not enough to try to discredit his win which a lot of people like to do. Not just with him but every boxer. Its actually one of the things I dislike about boxing fans. For exqample, at the time of manny vs oscar it was suppose to be a mismatch for oscar, manny can't win etc. Manny wins and now its weight drained oscar, shot oscar, etc.

                      Manny agreed to floyds demand 2nd time around, its up to floyd to make the fight.
                      I actually thought Oscar would be too big for Manny so not
                      trying to act like it wasn't so BUT if he took on a bigger Oscar
                      at 147. Why couldn't he fight Cotto at 147? I think Floyd
                      is going to have to call Manny on his bluff and just accept
                      the 7 days and make the fight. One of these guys have to
                      do it because as of right now. It looks like neither wants
                      the fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP