1. the one scorecard that had DLH winning was a joke, floyd won handily.
2. DLH didnt land alot of shots on floyd at all, he landed jabs early but barely a single clean powerpunch all night. floyd was riding and rolling with all of them. DLH has a much greater reach and far superior jab to pac who wont be able to outjab floyd for a second, keeping in mind floyd shut DLHs jab down in time.
3. again DLH barely landed any shots, but keep in mind floyd let DLH throw combinations looking to wear him out so he could come on strong in the final quarter of the fight. it worked too. he wouldnt let pac throw in combinations, he would use his legs and angles and box from a distance catching pac coming in and keeping him at the end of the stick. the height and reach is in floyds favor against pac unlike when he fougth DLH.
4. triangle theories dont work. styles make fights. DLH was the perfect oponent for pac and the nightmare oponent for floyd, floyd is a nightmare oponent for pac though (and pac in a way to floyd, but its even).
5. DLH was dead at the weight when he fought pac, anyone who knows boxing could see that just like anyone who knows boxing wouldnt use a triangle theory or say any of the other ******ed **** u do which makes no sense at all. every single one of your arguments are weak.
im not saying floyd beats pac, to me its a toss up. but all your arguments are wrong and they make no sense at all. you clearly dont understand the sweet science.
2. DLH didnt land alot of shots on floyd at all, he landed jabs early but barely a single clean powerpunch all night. floyd was riding and rolling with all of them. DLH has a much greater reach and far superior jab to pac who wont be able to outjab floyd for a second, keeping in mind floyd shut DLHs jab down in time.
3. again DLH barely landed any shots, but keep in mind floyd let DLH throw combinations looking to wear him out so he could come on strong in the final quarter of the fight. it worked too. he wouldnt let pac throw in combinations, he would use his legs and angles and box from a distance catching pac coming in and keeping him at the end of the stick. the height and reach is in floyds favor against pac unlike when he fougth DLH.
4. triangle theories dont work. styles make fights. DLH was the perfect oponent for pac and the nightmare oponent for floyd, floyd is a nightmare oponent for pac though (and pac in a way to floyd, but its even).
5. DLH was dead at the weight when he fought pac, anyone who knows boxing could see that just like anyone who knows boxing wouldnt use a triangle theory or say any of the other ******ed **** u do which makes no sense at all. every single one of your arguments are weak.
im not saying floyd beats pac, to me its a toss up. but all your arguments are wrong and they make no sense at all. you clearly dont understand the sweet science.
Comment