Originally posted by rican411
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Hopkins: "When Will Pacquiao Face a Top Black Fighter?"
Collapse
-
-
bhop plzz the best boxers in the game are latino and some asians black fighters been on the decline the only fighter is floyd thats it pwill isnt a great and alot of ure up and comers suck mike jones got schooled by soto peterson lost andd his little bro is going to lose danny jacobs got ko bhop stop hating with all that crap i have floyd beating pac if it goes down but black style is not a style idiot black fighters fight all type of ways floyd is a boxer and pwill is a puncher 2 different styles just shut ure mouth and get ktfo by pascal you racist bum
Comment
-
Originally posted by wess View Posthopkins is only stating a fact.... We dont see mayweather, mosley, pwill, berto, bradley, alexander, or even kirkland and judah. I'm sure the list could go on.... The fact is, hopkins has a very very valid point....
Hopkins point IS Valid as you say, but if you have common sense, you will see it has no logic, He beat Cotto....arguably the best WW besides Mayweather, he beat margarito, the guy that beat cotto, hes beat clottey...
All these top WW's but Hopkins and some fans arnt satisfied?
What would you do if a division didnt have 1 black person and all the top fighters were other races, Would you accuse them of ducking?
So how the *** can any1 say pac is ducking black fighters lol Mayweather And mosley are the only 2 people he can fight, Yet you wanna throw alexander and bradleys name into it, Hell they wouldnt get past Cotto Or Clottey, let alone Pacman
Comment
-
Is it stereotypical or factual to ask why didn't a fight with Zahir Raheem come off but they opted to fight Erik Morales who was coming off a loss in their rematch??
For the record, I COMPLETELY understand the Morales fight was more lucrative however, a fighter shouldn't be rewarded coming off a complete one sided loss that Zahir Raheem gave Erik at that time. All I'm saying is that doesn't help dispel the notion of Hopkins criticism and this isn't the first time we've heard this.
One could make a case way back with Tim Austin also..
Comment
-
Originally posted by marzblkman View PostIs it stereotypical or factual to ask why didn't a fight with Zahir Raheem come off but they opted to fight Erik Morales who was coming off a loss in their rematch??
For the record, I COMPLETELY understand the Morales fight was more lucrative however, a fighter shouldn't be rewarded coming off a complete one sided loss that Zahir Raheem gave Erik at that time. All I'm saying is that doesn't help dispel the notion of Hopkins criticism and this isn't the first time we've heard this.
One could make a case way back with Tim Austin also..
Morales vs Pac II was already ***ing signed and both Pac and Morales took tuneups. Morales lost his, Manny didn't, doesn't mean a legally binding contract suddenly becomes void. After Morales vs Pac II Raheem lost to Fritas who had nowhere near the skills pac had but some how morons like you still wanna make Raheem into some sort of stylistic nightmare for pac despite losing to a rather ordinary Fritas.
And Tim Austin oh my ***ing god other than being "black" what makes you think he should be in this conversation. Was it the clobbering Rafa marquez gave him or the ass whipping sure shot hall of famer Erik "***ing" Aiken gave him?
Comment
-
Originally posted by rican411 View PostPacman is gonna face reality when he steps in the ring against a non Mexican.
The only reason why both those guys had success against Manny is because neither of them were technically shot to ****. It was Morales last great fight and Marquez continued to go on a win streak after his fights with Pacquiao.
It's all about the quality of fighters Manny is facing, not the race. He's facing carefully selected fighters at the twilight's of their careers and reaping the benefits right now. More power to him but he's not exactly cleaning out divisions or even fighting the top guys in the sport. He's fighting the guys that are down swings or fighters that aren't that good in general.
Hopkins is a typical illiterate ******-bird though. To expect something to make sense coming out of his mouth is asking for too much.
Comment
-
Why is is always about race??? Manny has proven himself time and time again he has nothin else to proove and as far as for mexican fighters im not mexican but i will tell you manny hasnt fought a single Mexican fighter in his prime other than Margs if we go back and see all the mexican or mexican american fighters hes fought all of them were either not good competition or fighters who have been in too many wars or past there prime the only one i can think of is Margs and Marquez and well we know what happened with Marquez. Im a Manny fan but i think that second fight Marquez had the edge on that one
Comment
Comment