WBC grants hopkins request

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BadMagick
    Orange and Blue for life
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2005
    • 2672
    • 161
    • 79
    • 9,741

    #21
    Originally posted by riz
    hell man all the dam titles would be on the line, its a rematch for the undisputed championship. if ur the #1 contendor for a title, but the guy is the undsiputed champ, u win all the tiels
    The WBC could strip Taylor of the belt for not fighting his mandatory, much like they did with Tarver - Johnson. Instead of allowing this to happen, B-Hop went to the WBC council to make sure all of them were there.

    Neils: Perhaps he wants to end his career as the undisputed middleweight champion?

    Originally posted by riz
    for sure, but i mean taylro was giving him a rematch anyway so wtf....
    n to call it ETREMELY CONTROVERSIAL is jus dumb. it aint even controversial jsu a close fight. depends on how u judge to.
    most guys judge on aggressiveness, wwhich is y taylor won
    It's controversial because so many people thought B-Hop won, and an equal, perhaps greater or lesser, amount of people thought Taylor won. That's why it's controversial.

    Comment

    • vB Martin
      The Martinator
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2004
      • 1744
      • 131
      • 21
      • 8,177

      #22
      Originally posted by BadMagick
      Are you all ******ed, or? He obviously did it so the WBC belt would be on the line, not just so he'd get the rematch.
      You're a fine ****ing one to call anyone ******ed. The belt was "on the line" in the first match, so it would be covered by the rematch clause that was already built into the contract. I would ask hif you hadn't thought about that, but it's blatantly obvious you didn't think at all.

      It's a whiny ass ***** move because the rematch was already contractually guaranteed. He pulled this whiny ass ***** move because he saw Castillo, who was out on his feet, pull it. Both men lost my respect for this ****. You lost it, be a ****ing man and go get it back.

      Whiny Bitch Conference

      Comment

      • STEELHEAD
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Nov 2004
        • 14730
        • 537
        • 478
        • 27,196

        #23
        bitchkin is a sore looser.

        taylor already gave up the manditory to keep the worthless ibf belt and is still suspended from fighting because of a medical from the down to the skull headbutt gash.

        he's never said anything other than that his next fight will be hopkins.

        cant wait for the rematch .***** hop better have a different gameplan then he's used in his last several fights or taylors going to school him big time.

        Comment

        • moochi
          We need one organization!
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2004
          • 3444
          • 378
          • 60
          • 26,344

          #24
          i am a hopkins fan, but even this ruling is bull****...........hopkins kicked ass for four rounds and lost the other eight............

          so he lost fair and square, and he should try and get a rematch and fix his own mistakes of taking it easy during the fight.........

          the result was nowhere controversial nor irregular, except for the fact that it was that close a decision...........because any bystander would have scored the fight either 8 - 4 or 7 - 5.....simple as that.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP