JMM ******ed PAC at will w/ the straight right hand

[jrosales13]

Difference is Margarito likely cheated to beat Cotto while Baldomir beat Judah fairly. Also Baldomir was actually a legitimate belt holder when Floyd fought him while Margarito was not!

Are you serious?

[NesNY]

This fucking place is becoming unreadable.

becoming? lol.

[Vasyl’s dad]

Difference is Margarito likely cheated to beat Cotto while Baldomir beat Judah fairly. Also Baldomir was actually a legitimate belt holder when Floyd fought him while Margarito was not!

Actually, Tony had his belt longer than any other belt holder in the division.


Heres another difference,

Floyd fought both of those guys, who had a combined loss total of 12.

When Pac fought Miguel and Tony, they only had 7 losses between them, 2 less than Baldomir had when he fought Floyd.

Oh, and another difference,

Pac destroyed both of them while Floyd played pitty pat.

[Johnwoo8686]

so you're saying beating Judah and Baldomir is a greater accomplishment than beating Cotto and Margarito?

Lol. Since Margarito's handwraps scandal he has looked mediocre at best. He came into the Pacquiao fight with 6 losses and most of his past wins questionable. Also Cotto hasnt looked the same since the beat down Margs gave him (likely with handwraps). The reasons I stated for you are the reasons why Freddy Roach and team chose those fights for Pacquiao, Freddy even said it himself. Floyd fought Baldomir and Judah because those guys were actual belt holders at the time.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

Lol. Since Margarito's handwraps scandal he has looked mediocre at best. He came into the Pacquiao fight with 6 losses and most of his past wins questionable. Also Cotto hasnt looked the same since the beat down Margs gave him (likely with handwraps). The reasons I stated for you are the reasons why Freddy Roach and team chose those fights for Pacquiao, Freddy even said it himself. Floyd fought Baldomir and Judah because those guys were actual belt holders at the time.

so again, beating Judah and Baldomir is a greater accomplishment than beating Cotto and Margarito?

[Vasyl’s dad]

Lol. Since Margarito's handwraps scandal he has looked mediocre at best. He came into the Pacquiao fight with 6 losses and most of his past wins questionable. Also Cotto hasnt looked the same since the beat down Margs gave him (likely with handwraps). The reasons I stated for you are the reasons why Freddy Roach and team chose those fights for Pacquiao, Freddy even said it himself. Floyd fought Baldomir and Judah because those guys were actual belt holders at the time.

It gets even better.

[Johnwoo8686]

Actually, Tony had his belt longer than any other belt holder in the division.


Heres another difference,

Floyd fought both of those guys, who had a combined loss total of 12.

When Pac fought Miguel and Tony, they only had 7 losses between them, 2 less than Baldomir had when he fought Floyd.

Oh, and another difference,

Pac destroyed both of them while Floyd played pitty pat.

LMAO, When Pac fought Margarito this past weekend he was a "FORMER" welterweight world champion fighting for a vacant Light middleweight belt. With the handwraps scandal all those past wins are now su****ious. Yes Cotto had 1 loss but he hadnt looked like the same fighter since that loss. Pac was there when Cotto looked awful against Clottey and after that performance asked for a fight with Cotto.

[Johnwoo8686]

so again, beating Judah and Baldomir is a greater accomplishment than beating Cotto and Margarito?

This was 2006. Judah and Baldomir were the guys to beat at welterweight not Cotto and Margarito.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

This was 2006. Judah and Baldomir were the guys to beat at welterweight not Cotto and Margarito.

ok, you're dismissed

[jrosales13]

This was 2006. Judah and Baldomir were the guys to beat at welterweight not Cotto and Margarito.

Marg was the best WW at the time.

But, he wasn't the man to beat? OK..........