Does it bother anybody else that Pacquiao

[T.Horton]

It's debateble that Hatton was the best 140 pounder, but he was the lineal champ. Somewhat similar to Baldomir. And I love how you just skip lightweight. And at welter, Clottey was a solid win, but it does mean something that Cotto was 2 pounds under the limit. I give Pac a lot credit for beating a much bigger man, but don't pretend that Marg was relevant at welter or junior middle. And it's no concinsidence that the guys Pac's faught and May hasn't are Top Rank fighters. People love to bring up guys that May has ducked like Marg, but bring up guys that Pac "Ducked" and you've got a national emerency. And may be a racist. Everyone cherry picks. Only for some it's overlooked. See there? I responded, and I didn't even need to say names. It's not like we're six after all.

No, Hatton was the man at 140. He was established, he may or may not have been on the down slope of a career that, due to his style, had a very short shelf life, he was still the man at the weight - same as Baldomir.

And yeah, I skipped light weight - why? Because Pac virtually did too. Before you go taking me literally I said virtually. If I offended you, I may have taken something you said wrong - I was expecting a fight when I wrote this so I came in with a bit of a chip on my should. My apologies.

And Marg is relevant - not so much as he used to be but I, personally, thought he stood a great chance at beating Pacquiao and for a brief second it looked like he might.

[T.Horton]

Considering Marg did it first, and Cotto was considered a beast at the time, then I would say Marg cleaned out the division, and Pac took credit for it.

According to these guys at least.

uh, I started the thread, and I said no such thing.

Get laid.

[Kagami Taiga]

Yeah, at least Josie was undefeated when Mayweather check hooked her.

isnt this kinda **** old??? its not even funny anymore. we get it, floyd only fights women. what does that have to do with paquiao???

[SOPH~ REP.]

It bothers me that manny has cleaned out all the top-top rank fighters,it bothers me that manny has fought only 1 style of fighter in the past 6 years (slow),it bother me that manny could've made a fight with mosley but gave it to an underserving marg,yet another top rank fighter.

[BattleHardened]

uh, I started the thread, and I said no such thing.

Get laid.

You know you lost, that's why everyone time you reply to me you insult me, and don't say much else.

Fact is Pac BASICALLY or not BASICALLY Pac has done no such thing. He has not basically cleaned out any division.

[GoogleMe]

I agree, Pacquiao is ther greater of him and Floyd. But let's get real - HE beat a WW in Margarito. JWW is still there for Pacquiao to fight a REAL threat at 154.

[T.Horton]

Manny beat Cotto at a catchweight and defended his title one time against Clottey at WW.

JrWW Manny beat Ricky Hatton and defended his title zero times at the division. if that is cleaning out the division then Floyd cleaned out the ww division this year by beating the 1 WW and lineal champ in one sided fight.




are you ****ing serious?

he beat the champ at 140 and then moved on. why would he have to fight contenders when he is moving on to bigger and better things?

And at welter he beat three of the top five fighters of the last couple of years (as Black Rose alluded to). How is that not cleaning out a division?

Are you serious?

[T.Horton]

You know you lost, that's why everyone time you reply to me you insult me, and don't say much else.

Fact is Pac BASICALLY or not BASICALLY Pac has done no such thing. He has not basically cleaned out any division.

No, I am insulting you because you came at with the attitude of a smarmy little gob****e.

That's why. go re-read what I have been saying.

[Kagami Taiga]

No, Hatton was the man at 140. He was established, he may or may not have been on the down slope of a career that, due to his style, had a very short shelf life, he was still the man at the weight - same as Baldomir.

And yeah, I skipped light weight - why? Because Pac virtually did too. Before you go taking me literally I said virtually. If I offended you, I may have taken something you said wrong - I was expecting a fight when I wrote this so I came in with a bit of a chip on my should. My apologies.

And Marg is relevant - not so much as he used to be but I, personally, thought he stood a great chance at beating Pacquiao and for a brief second it looked like he might.

and yea ur personally a fool for underestimating pac. margs stood a chance in hell and everyone knew it thats exactly why he was a 6 to 1 underdog. the media may hype these fights up, but the bookies pay attention to this kinda ****, ppl who bet on sports dont listen to the hype. and neither should u...u call yourself a boxing fan and u thought that antonio margarito stood a chance???

i had friends come up to me and ask me if they should bet on margarito and i said hell no, but i advised them to bet on him going the distance. u should have known better.

[brick wall]

Dudes in here are mad..

but they're claiming they're not bothered...hilarious