Comments Thread For: Klitschko's Manager: "Haye, It's 50-50 Across or No Fight!"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Hammer
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 50797
    • 3,416
    • 8,704
    • 58,851

    #21
    Anyone who can't figure out that Haye is ducking the Klitschkos is an idiot.

    50-50 is obviously more than Haye deserves.

    Comment

    • FLYBOY
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2007
      • 3587
      • 217
      • 157
      • 10,239

      #22
      Why does Wlad want a piece of the Sky sports cake. Let him keep the German cake and let Haye keep the British cake.

      Comment

      • dvb
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2010
        • 1479
        • 75
        • 106
        • 7,684

        #23
        Any body who supports the Klitschkos is an idiot,who doesnt like real boxing,and likes cowards who need 3 rematches agianst the chisoras and brigg's of this world,just laughable!. Who fight scared,who dont use thier full power and height to advatanges of beating the bums and KO'ing them early like they should seen as none of them even really punch back!.

        This statement from klits. guy is nothing new.

        tell me how its fair for some boring,safety first,scared fighter in klitsckos to demand money that they have nothing to do with in sky money.

        There own fault for being crap businessmen and not getting themselves a good deal like Haye has for sky.

        its even to say you keep your money from your fans who watch you on tv,and ile keep my money from my fans who watch me on tv.Each keep own money that we have agreed with our own people.

        Surely Hayes the better guy here if hes earning more money!.

        Comment

        • dvb
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 1479
          • 75
          • 106
          • 7,684

          #24
          winner 60,loser 40,bonus for a KO,winner gets more in revenuethan they would if lose

          I think they should put it as it was before,but with this sticking point of revenues that they should put in the stipulation that the winner takes it all!.

          or if klitsckos wins they can take a share in hayes sky money seen as it would have been earnt,but if they lose they get nothing from Hayes side of revenue and keep thier own pitiful german money!.

          Bonus for who wins by KO if by KO at all.

          Maybe even see if klits are brave and confident enough in thinking they can win,winner gets 60 %,lose 40%.

          worked fine for bhop and jones rematch,and that deal sorted years of negotiations out,why not work for Haye v klitschkos fights?.

          Comment

          • taansend
            In denial about UK refs
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2004
            • 2444
            • 157
            • 428
            • 9,153

            #25
            Originally posted by timba
            I would love for Haye to take a hit on his purse to get the fight made, but I can understand his reasons for not doing so.
            Nice post Timba, although you didn't insult anyone so many on here won't bother reading it.

            Just because Haye doesn't share the UK TV rights doesn't mean he's ducking the Klits. You could argue the other way around.

            But I won't as they would be just as childish. This is about money, not personal courage. Haye & the Klit bros have more of both than all of us.

            Comment

            • Dave Rado
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2008
              • 8064
              • 266
              • 453
              • 14,460

              #26
              Originally posted by deadbeat hero
              slightly disingenuous imo. Haye is more than happy to share his sky cash, as long as the Klitschko's are prepared to bring a similar deal to the table. Why would Haye want any part of a business deal that fell some way short of maximising it's potential ? Haye is the one that is going in there and potentially having his head knocked off, I think it's fair enough that he wants to be rewarded as much as possible for that, and for putting his title and boxing status on the line. Haye could lose everything in this fight.

              I'm pretty sure that Haye's attitude is the one that would be taken by nearly every other boxer in the sport, should they be fortunate enough to be in Haye's position. It's not like the dude is demanding things so utterly ridiculous that the fight could never possibly happen, he simply wants what he's worth.
              Either you haven't been following boxing during the last year or you're simply lying.

              Comment

              • Dave Rado
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2008
                • 8064
                • 266
                • 453
                • 14,460

                #27
                Originally posted by black.ink
                Haye doesn't deserve a 50/50 split, but if that's what team Klit are offering, i'm intrigued to hear what Haye has to say to this.
                He was offered the same deal last May and said no.

                You obviously haven't been keeping up.

                Comment

                • PRBOXINGCOTTO
                  PRBOXINGCOTTO
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 8566
                  • 266
                  • 147
                  • 15,057

                  #28
                  i would give hay 30% he hasnt done **** in his career at heavyweight

                  Comment

                  • nomadman
                    Eurasian gonna get you
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 4336
                    • 243
                    • 532
                    • 10,656

                    #29
                    Originally posted by BrooklynBomber
                    Watch how every single british poster in this thread makes a 50-50 deal as something new and astonishing. That deal was on the table since May. But what can I say, cowards and liars tend to stick for each other.
                    Hold your horses mate. Do not lump us all in the same boat.

                    Comment

                    • BrooklynBomber
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2004
                      • 28365
                      • 1,563
                      • 1,541
                      • 44,979

                      #30
                      Originally posted by It's Ovah
                      Hold your horses mate. Do not lump us all in the same boat.
                      My apologies, however if you noticed, my wording did not gather up all englishmen, but all englishmen of certain kind, rooting for Haye and intentionally omitting the facts, so they can produce a more favorable picture for the reputation of their protege. It makes for a certain kind of lying hypocricy, which annoys me to no end.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP