David Haye has the #1 KO% in HWC history!
Collapse
-
-
Danny Williams stopped Tyson faster than Lennox did.
Williams was destroyed and ruined by Vitali. That was one of the most brutal one-sided beatdowns of all time. Williams became a shot fighter and was never the same after getting annihilated by Vitali.
Fraudley is 1-1 against shot Williams.
YOU FAIL AGAIN.Comment
-
lol @ "classic heavyweight"Ive seen the fight more times than anyone on this site...Answer me this... Why did Vitali look like a used Tampon and Lennox walked away with a clean face?
As far as Hayes Ko ratio I will say this for the last time:
Cruiserweight= 200 lbs = Classic Heavyweight
The mean average weight of Haye's opponents is higher than that of Ali, Jack Dempsey and most Heavyweight greats.
If you really want to get fussy about it, Haye's KO ratio of opponents who weighed 200-299 lbs is 100%.
the desperation reeks
so what you're saying is that out of haye's few lame victories at HW, he stopped 3, and the other doesn't count because Valuev is too big
so haye is supposed to be noted for... TKOing 3 hyperventilating 40 year olds? (ruiz, barrett, harrison)?
hes to be compared to vitali and lennox for that?
wow
just stop... jesusComment
-
You use past prime fighters to try and prove the Klitschko's are better than Lewis, but call them shot when someone does it against to the Klitschko's. You are a complete nuthuggin fool.Comment
-
Vitali or Haye shouldn't be compared to Lewis. Vitali's greatest achievement is losing to an old out of shape Lewis.Comment
-
haye doesnt have enough fights to even be considered in serious all-time KO ratio records, or else wed probably find some guy who was HW champion for 1 fight in the 1800s then retired and rank his astounding 100% ko ratio #1
vitali lost on a cut but was obviously winning the fight
and to the people who say vitali beat an "old" briggs, do any of you comprehend the fact that vitali is actually OLDER than briggs is? vitali has been past prime for years and years but nobody mentions it because he never losesComment
-
An "old" fighter doesn't have to be older in age.haye doesnt have enough fights to even be considered in serious all-time KO ratio records, or else wed probably find some guy who was HW champion for 1 fight in the 1800s then retired and rank his astounding 100% ko ratio #1
vitali lost on a cut but was obviously winning the fight
and to the people who say vitali beat an "old" briggs, do any of you comprehend the fact that vitali is actually OLDER than briggs is? vitali has been past prime for years and years but nobody mentions it because he never loses
Comment
-
haye doesnt have enough fights to even be considered in serious all-time KO ratio records, or else wed probably find some guy who was HW champion for 1 fight in the 1800s then retired and rank his astounding 100% ko ratio #1
vitali lost on a cut but was obviously winning the fight
and to the people who say vitali beat an "old" briggs, do any of you comprehend the fact that vitali is actually OLDER than briggs is? vitali has been past prime for years and years but nobody mentions it because he never loses
Vitali's injury allowed him to basically rest his body for all those years, he can't be compared to a boxer that has been fighting year after year after year. Briggs is so out of his prime it's not even funny, I remember in the Ibragimov fight he was winded after the first few rounds and only threw about 30 punches the entire 12 rounds.Comment
-
exactly. "old" is whatever suits your biased opinions.
when vitali beats fighters younger than him age means nothing
when vitali made lennox look bad age meant everything
Wait for Haye to heroically come out and say "lets make this happen!" when Vitali turns 40 in a few months and retires. Then Haye can say Vitali ducked him. And the crosseyed british ******s on this forum will nod in agreement.Comment
Comment