Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Manny Pacquiao is a disgrace to this sport....

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
    dude , that evil 1-2 ****** just compared pacquiao to jack the ripper and murder.

    jesus people are ****ing dumb.
    Haha yeah that had to be the dumbest post of all time.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by mikelovesfood View Post
      I held my tongue when they said they would make this fight for a contracted 150lb jr MW bout. , but now him coming in at 144 is just ****ing absurd. If you want to fight MW then weigh in at MW. If you want to be HW then weigh in as heavy weight. It's black and white . Night and day. No gray. I understand how everyone here is so ****ing oblivious.
      boxing history is littered with great fighters coming under their contracted weights. Most times they lose - what is your problem with this?

      Comment


      • Originally posted by kuhl_jackman View Post
        Huh? whats the connection? here just drink your milk!
        Originally posted by deanrw View Post
        Haha yeah that had to be the dumbest post of all time.
        Lol, if you don't get the message I was trying to get across with this example then you need to go back to school. People justify Pac getting catchweight titles because OTHER BOXERS HAVE DONE SO. They're basically saying that it's right to do something wrong JUST BECAUSE OTHERS HAVE DONE IT IN THE PAST. DO YOU SEE THE REASON WHY I LIKENED IT TO THAT HYPOTHETICAL SITUATION?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by titan_1987 View Post
          Pac can weigh whatever weight he wants. There nothing in the contract stipulating that he must weigh above a certain minimum weight. What boxing rule even states that if you fight at a certain weight limit (like say welterweight), you have to weigh in at exactly 141-147 so that fight can be legit?

          Stop b!tching about this woman. Boxers nowadays fighting at a certain limit are heavier come fight night like 10+lbs over. This nothing new. So if the other guy chooses to weigh smaller, that's not our f'kin problem.

          I don't really get your logic. Whining and nagging about such little things. It's clear as day that both agreed to the catchweight. If anything that you should get mad about, get mad at the WBC for even sanctioning this as a title fight.
          You are so full of it. Theres no point in arguing with someone this blind.

          Comment


          • are some of you seriously complaining because pacquiao has handicapped himself even further? you people are not very bright....chances are the man has bitten off more than he can chew. why are you haters hating? lol

            Do your thing Manny, shut these bums up!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by SILVA View Post
              Weighing in at 144 for a title fight at 154?

              And people try deny he is the catchweight king? That is a joke and any real fan of the sport won't deny that....

              I won't be watching this fight, I was rooting for him to beat Plastercheato but honestly now I hope he gets KTFO...
              I think you are misconstrued, sir.

              Pacquiao can weigh in at any weight BELOW 154 for the SWW. See WEIGHT DIVISIONS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight_class_%28boxing%29)

              SUPER WELTERWEIGHT is 147-154. Margarito weighed in as 150 and could balloon up to 160+ at fight night.

              Pacquiao at 144.6 can weigh in as far as 150 at fight night (more like 148-149).

              So a 10 lbs weight handicapped and up to 20 lbs handicap is possible!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by The Evil 1-2 View Post
                Lol, if you don't get the message I was trying to get across with this example then you need to go back to school. People justify Pac getting catchweight titles because OTHER BOXERS HAVE DONE SO. They're basically saying that it's right to do something wrong JUST BECAUSE OTHERS HAVE DONE IT IN THE PAST. DO YOU SEE THE REASON WHY I LIKENED IT TO THAT HYPOTHETICAL SITUATION?
                Catchweight are not ok not because somebody else did it.

                Its ok because its allowed. Your jack the ripper example missed the mark completely because if someone did what jack the ripper did to women, he'd be executed... ESPECIALLY in texas where they actually have the death penalty.

                Catchweights are ok because there is basically no rule against it, and boxers have been doing this for years.

                Now as fans, you have the right to disagree with it. But please. Next time, use a better allegory to explain your side and not something as far out as jack the ripper.

                Comment


                • I dont get it...

                  Who cares if he weighed in light.

                  You do know Floyd weighed in at 150 for a 154lb title right?

                  You can weigh as light as you want.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by AFighter4U View Post
                    Catchweight are not ok not because somebody else did it.

                    Its ok because its allowed. Your jack the ripper example missed the mark completely because if someone did what jack the ripper did to women, he'd be executed... ESPECIALLY in texas where they actually have the death penalty.

                    Catchweights are ok because there is basically no rule against it, and boxers have been doing this for years.

                    Now as fans, you have the right to disagree with it. But please. Next time, use a better allegory to explain your side and not something as far out as jack the ripper.
                    I guess people are not getting what I'm saying. Catchweight fights are OK; you hit the nail on the head. BUT CATCHWEIGHT TITLE FIGHTS AREN'T...MANNY WILL FOREVER BE KNOWN FOR 8 DIFFERENT TITLES IN 8 DIFFERENT WEIGHT DIVISIONS BY THE END OF TOMORROW AND HE WILL FOREVER BE KNOWN AS THE ONLY BOXER TO DO SO...lol, yeah my allegory was extreme, but some of the justifications for this fight have been on the same side of the spectrum

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by 2Fast View Post
                      since when is weight limit = weight maximum?
                      lets define these 2 words LIMIT and MAXIMUM

                      limit - the maximum or minimum amount, or the largest or lowest quantity, that is available or allowed

                      maximum - the largest amount, number, extent, or degree possible or allowed

                      therefore i conclude those two words u mentioned are pretty much the same

                      if u convert that sentence into a mathematical equation it would be like


                      1 (weight limit) = 1 (weight maximum)

                      but you are trying to say that

                      when did 1(weight limit) equals to 2(weight maximum)?

                      thus you are contradicting yourself.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP