Tweet
Originally posted by Manny_P
-
pacquaio is the one that got lucky with that punch knocking him down, or else marquez wouldve of won, yep hes right, stfu or should i say, **** OUTTA HERE! haha -
Originally posted by xcaret
nyahahahaha. nyahahahahaha. nyahahahahahaha. MEEEEEEENG!Comment
-
cahahahahaha. cahahahahha. cahahaha.. BIIITCH!!!!!Originally posted by Manny_PComment
-
Originally posted by Manny_P
"so good and handsome"..what are you talking about?? Looks have nothing to do with anything..especially boxing.
Actually, since you dont know what I was thinking I'll tell you..it went something like this:..well, he just about got put out that time..damn, he better start counterign pac or its over. THEN, after the second rd. I was thinking..AH HA, Marquez has entered the building! Wow, look at him make pac look like an amateur. pac has amazing power and is exciting..that doesnt make him a good BOXER, which is why it's not about luck but about skill. 9 out of 10 times, the technician beats the puncher. You can check that out if you think I'm making it up cause it's fact.
Comment
-
Damn "tracy" I would have to say that I agree with you in everything you just wrote. Hopefully this will prove to "mannyp" that his wrong and he will accept that it wasnt about luck it was about skill.Originally posted by tracylee"so good and handsome"..what are you talking about?? Looks have nothing to do with anything..especially boxing. Actually, since you dont know what I was thinking I'll tell you..it went something like this:..well, he just about got put out that time..damn, he better start counterign pac or its over. THEN, after the second rd. I was thinking..AH HA, Marquez has entered the building! Wow, look at him make pac look like an amateur. pac has amazing power and is exciting..that doesnt make him a good BOXER, which is why it's not about luck but about skill. 9 out of 10 times, the technician beats the puncher. You can check that out if you think I'm making it up cause it's fact.Comment
-
JMM is technically way more superior boxer than PAc but also he got lucky to get a draw. The judge made a technical error, that's a fact.Comment
-
People keep saying Pac won only one round. If I recall, he beat JMM pretty good in the 2nd round and even more in the later rounds. How often did JMM's nose bleed that night? It wasn't like Pac was missing his target for 11 rounds. People seem to make this fight more one sided for JMM than it really was.Comment
-
People keep talking about the judge who scored the first rd. 10-7 instead of 10-6...even though it is up to the individual judge when it comes to taking more than 2 pts. There is NO rule that he has to take 3. Also, if we have to take that judge's score into account, then the judge that scored it so heavily in favor of Pac needs his scores questioned too. If we do that, we probably have another draw, regardless. If a win comes down to whether a judge only took 2 pts instead of 3 away for the knockdowns, then I dont see the drama or debate cause you have pac winning by a single pt. How any pac fans can say JMM got by on luck with all that considered is beyond me..unless theyre just too bias (which I understand up to a certain point..I have the same warm, fuzzy feelings for GattiOriginally posted by luisillo22
)
Comment
-
So if the fight is a draw regardless, why did JMM priced himself out and ducked both Pac and Morales. He's not marketable fighter, why did he asked for a the moon.Comment
-
His management has alot to do with that..and theres always the possibility that he thinks he deserves more. I honestly dont know; only JMM does. But, that has nothing to do with him deserving a draw in the first fight, and it has nothing to do with how the first fight was scored (or this mystical "luck" that some keep referring to)Originally posted by SliquestylezComment
Comment