hmm
This is a funny thread, a joke, right?
1) Tarver being a top 50 lhw of all time? Is that supposed to be good? That's a lot of ****in' fighters.
2) Tarver beat 3 top 5 lightheavyweights of his era...Harding, Jones, and Johnson. However, yes, it would have looked better if he had not lost to them all the first go-round.
3) When Tarver did beat Roy and Johnson, they were past their primes.
4) If Roy beats Tarver in the rubbermatch, Tarver will be a footnote on the pages of boxing history. It would look bad for him to lose to a 36 yr old man who went through what Roy has went through, mainly because Tarver already STOPPED him once (not sure I'd call it a KO, Roy did get up after all, Nady stopped the fight, semantics anyway but who cares).
Tarver overall is a good fighter. A good fighter is enough to beat a faded great fighter.
This is a funny thread, a joke, right?
1) Tarver being a top 50 lhw of all time? Is that supposed to be good? That's a lot of ****in' fighters.

2) Tarver beat 3 top 5 lightheavyweights of his era...Harding, Jones, and Johnson. However, yes, it would have looked better if he had not lost to them all the first go-round.
3) When Tarver did beat Roy and Johnson, they were past their primes.
4) If Roy beats Tarver in the rubbermatch, Tarver will be a footnote on the pages of boxing history. It would look bad for him to lose to a 36 yr old man who went through what Roy has went through, mainly because Tarver already STOPPED him once (not sure I'd call it a KO, Roy did get up after all, Nady stopped the fight, semantics anyway but who cares).
Tarver overall is a good fighter. A good fighter is enough to beat a faded great fighter.
Comment