Mike Tyson sums up why the Klitschkos are Boring HW champions

[adamt]

Tyson explains it well,

[Russian Crushin]

Because they are clean cut men without controversity

[vercingetorix3]

Pretty much.

[starkiller]

I thought he was a fan of vitali or was it wlad... Did he lie?

[IronDanHamza]

Mike makes good points he highlights there great fighters just not that exciting.

[FeFist]

I thought he was a fan of vitali or was it wlad... Did he lie?

Why do you ask? It's not like he hit out against them. As far as I'm concerned he praised them.

[The Hammer]

If Wlad ****d a beauty queen, took a bite out of an opponent's ear and said he was going to eat David Haye's baby, would he be exciting then?

Or maybe if he had the reverse of the surgery that Michael Jackson had, and became a black man? Would the gay white boys that only get excited by black boxers get turned on by him then?

[Dempsey-Roll]

I agree with Mike 110%

[SCtrojansbaby]

Mike is basically saying the Klitschkos are not exciting by themselves if they had a Holyfield or Foreman that would make them more exciting

[starkiller]

Mike is basically saying the Klitschkos are not exciting by themselves if they had a Holyfield or Foreman that would make them more exciting

Why would that change their jab, jab approach? Wouldn't they just jab those opponents to death too and people complain aswell? Why didn't Larry Holmes and George Foreman ever fight? Who didn't want that fight?