Carl Froch's resume >>> Joe Calzaghe's resume

[MiguelDirrell25]

Give Margarito credit for being a badass or I'll stop you from ever posting on this site again.

Agree with me that Margarito is better than Cotto and beats him no matter when they fight because he is mas macho.

Admit that Cotto can't deal with big strong Mexicans that put pressure on him and admit that Cotto is a quitter.

If you don't agree to my terms, I'll end you.

You're a grade A dumba55

Cotto only loss because cheato had plaster of paris elements stuffed in his wraps

Cotto wins 99/100 against plaster less cheato

[BennyST]

You know damn well Kessler only got that decision because the fight was in Denmark.

Whereas Calzaghe avoids prime fighters (sans Lacy), Froch has no fear and administers pwnage to prime fighters on the regular.

That makes him superior.

Plus, he has way better taste in woman. Calzaghe's g/f on 24/7 looked like some ex stripper.

That is just straight up BS. Kessler clearly won that fight. It was a close but clear decision for Kessler. If it was somewhere else and Froch won it would have been the wrong decision. Kessler actually won the fight, Froch didn't. It wasn't because he was in Denmark, it was because he won the fight. I think you'll find that just about everyone, bar a few Froch fans, had Kessler up by a couple of rounds.

If you think he did win, you can't score a fight.

[daggum]

back by popular demand the joe calzaghe will knock the **** out you post



[IMG]http://i28.***********.com/albums/c217/natas206/accuracy.gif[/IMG]

[BennyST]

Wrong in the first one. I Picked Pac in 8 wich was wrong anyways thanks to Hattons machismo.Cotto-Pacquiao Cotto was suppiose to win, but got beat by the greates. Cotto-Margarito after the plaster kicked in, forget about it.


Calzghez's resume and accomplishments ****s on Froch anyday
of the week

Errr, no he wasn't. Pacquiao was the favourite in that fight. He was supposed to do exactly what he did.

[FloydTBE]

The cobra will be back stronge than ever

[Bastian Loc]

That is just straight up BS. Kessler clearly won that fight. It was a close but clear decision for Kessler. If it was somewhere else and Froch won it would have been the wrong decision. Kessler actually won the fight, Froch didn't. It wasn't because he was in Denmark, it was because he won the fight. I think you'll find that just about everyone, bar a few Froch fans, had Kessler up by a couple of rounds.

If you think he did win, you can't score a fight.

lmao, you're the one that can't score a fight. Aside from giving me a bunch of no names that Calzaghe is supposedly great for beating.... lol @ Byron Mitchell for example...

You really think Kessler "clearly" won?

Cuz' I'm pretty sure if you rewatch that fight without Calzaghe's nuts in your tonsils you'll see that Froch could have easily won 7-5.

[Ether]

First post owned.


Prime RJJ and Hopkins would of had fun with Calzaghe.

[Ragnar Lothbrok]

back by popular demand the joe calzaghe will knock the **** out you post



[IMG]http://i28.***********.com/albums/c217/natas206/accuracy.gif[/IMG]

that tub of lard ref that stop the manfredo fight needs to be severely beaten then never allowed to ref again.

[mathed]

AS IF!!!!

That is a purely subjective viewpoint and you know it. I fancy Froch would impose his self on Calzaghe and k.o him.

Just because you find him moar aesthetically pleasing doesn't make him a better fighter.

You couldn't qualify that if you wanted to.

Cotto is "theoretically" more "skilled" than Tony, but Tony made him his bitch and forced him to quit on his knees like a heartless **********.

Calzaghe could come out of retirement now and tax that ass, Froch gets tko'd or loses a ud easily

[RichCCFC]

Are you kidding? So Taylor and Kessler were in their primes were they? Robin Ried was in his prime huh? I could have sworn Kessler retired straight after and had been looking old and not nearly the fighter of four/five years previous. I also could have sworn that Taylor had been knocked out, hadn't won a fight in ages, got knocked out again straight after and also retired. I also could have sworn that Calzaghe had fought a prime Reid nearly ten years before the shot version of Reid.

Those guys while younger, were not on the same level as Hopkins. Jones was shot, but BHop was still at the top and, most importantly, went on to have one of his greatest career performances afterward and has kept winning. He was old, but not even close to being shot. I can't think of two fighters that would have beaten Hop that night. Maybe Dawson?

But, with Hopkins, since Taylor at MW. His only loss has been to Calzaghe and in that time he has beaten Winky Wright, Roy Jones, Antonio Tarver, Kelly Pavlik, and Enrique Ornelas. His only from 2005 to 2010 being to Calzaghe with a bunch of other HOF wins in the meantime. He's not shot. It's why people are still giving him a huge chance at beating Pascal. What if he does beat Pascal? Will you still say he was shot when he fought Calzaghe three years earlier but then went on to find his prime again and beat two great young champs? I actually heard that as an excuse after he beat Pavlik. People said he found his prime again but was shot against Calzaghe.

Also, Froch lost to Kessler. If you lose a fight, it shouldn't be included on your resume as making you better than someone else. He hasn't even fought Abraham yet so we don't know what's going on there. Maybe you're just taking the piss, calling everyone on Froch's prime and just spouting old for the big names on Calzaghe's.

More importantly though, you may look only at the big names, or only the ones you know about on Calzaghe's resume, but he does have a lot of other good names that people have forgotten. I'm certainly not saying his resume is amazing or anything, but don't be daft. It's makes Froch's look amateur and always will.

It looks like this:
Calzaghe: The Champions
Hopkins (old, but not shot and was still great)
Kessler
Jones (shot)
Eubanks
Lacy
Sakio Bika
Charles Brewer: IBF SMW champ
Robin Reid: WBC SMW champ
Richie Woodhall: WBC SMW champ
Byron Mitchell: 2 time WBA SMW champ
The Top Contenders and other title holders like IBO etc or Interim champs
Omar Sheika 20-1 just come off big wins over Simon Brown and Glen Johnson
Mario Veit 30-0
Luciano Torres 45-2
Juan Carlos Ferrera 51-8
David Starie 22-1
Mark Delaney 21-0
Evans Ashira 24-1
etc.

Froch: The champs
Jean Pascal
Jermain Taylor (shot)
Robin Reid (shot)
The Contenders
Andre Dirrell 18-0
Brian Magee 25-2
Sergey Tatevosyan 26-7
Henry Porras 30-4

Good post and

/ thread.

A lot of people have only watched boxing for 2 years max and see Froch fighting decent guys, the dude is like 33 and didn't fight anyone until he was 31. They also have no idea who Byron Mitchell and the likes are.