Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Carl Froch's resume >>> Joe Calzaghe's resume

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by INSECT View Post
    You know damn well Kessler only got that decision because the fight was in Denmark.

    Whereas Calzaghe avoids prime fighters (sans Lacy), Froch has no fear and administers pwnage to prime fighters on the regular.

    That makes him superior.

    Plus, he has way better taste in woman. Calzaghe's g/f on 24/7 looked like some ex stripper.
    I'll admit it was a close fight. But no robbery at all. Kessler hurt Froch to the body numerous times in that fight and was the agressor in some of the rounds. Hell, I heard Burner say that Paul Williams' resume was better than Calzaghe's and people called him a dumb ass for it. But I really don't know what is so far fetched about that because Williams beat a prime Margarito in Cali. Beat Winky which deserves more credit than a shot Roy Jones even if Winky was old. And a win over Martinez is on par with Calzaghe's win over Hopkins since both fights were fought competitively.

    Comment


    • #12
      dunno how old id consider hopkins at that point, he went on to have some very good wins afterwards - hes definitely old as hell now mind you

      and why did you put abraham on frochs resume? they havent fought yet. What if he gets obliterated?

      they both beat kessler IMO

      frochs more of a gutsy fighter than calz but i dont know if he necessarily has a better record.. YET, lets see in a couple years

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by INSECT View Post
        Calzaghe: Eubank, Jones (old), Hopkins (old), Lacy, Bika, Manfredo, Veit, Brewer, Sheika, Kessler


        Froch: Abraham, Dirrell, Kessler, Taylor, Jean Pascal, Jermain Taylor, Reid

        (all prime)
        If Joe would've fought Jones and Hopkins in their prime, he'd have a better argument.

        Not only this, Joe clearly ducked Froch and retired rather than face him which makes it even worse.

        In summary, Froch shits all over Calzaghe.



        To be fair the Kessler that fought the zagman was one of the best looking up and comers in the sport. He took too long to come stateside for big fights and had slowed down by the time he got into the ring with froch. He'd have killed Froch in his prime. Hell, i think he'd have done a bit better with andre ward.

        Taylor never had enough down the stretch at any point in his career to deal with a big strong puncher like froch (i was ringside for that fight)


        The Hopkins that fought Joe Calzaghe was a top p4p fighter at the time, and also the legit LHW world champion
        old but still very good. nothing like today



        Joe's got the superior resume at this point
        though froch has fought the best of the best only for years now and must be commended


        all that being said i think joe's the superior fighter by a real stretch and a legit ATG SMW

        Comment


        • #14
          I agree with you that Froch has a better resume' but Zags is greater due to his longevity and flawless record.

          And..... Zags win over Kessler will always give him the advantage in head to head comparissons. Froch will never live that down.

          Comment


          • #15
            Calzaghe is the greates SMW of all time. Froch even thiugh is fun to watch doesnt come close. Calzaghe would had dismantle him. Hell this ols ******* abuser Calzaghe schools him

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by El C@cique@PR View Post
              Calzaghe is the greates SMW of all time. Froch even thiugh is fun to watch doesnt come close. Calzaghe would had dismantle him. Hell this ols ******* abuser Calzaghe schools him
              Calzaghe's fighting style is shit. Got a bunch of stoppages in Wales that were gifted to him without earning him with that slapping style.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by INSECT View Post
                Calzaghe: Eubank, Jones (old), Hopkins (old), Lacy, Bika, Manfredo, Veit, Brewer, Sheika, Kessler


                Froch: Abraham, Dirrell, Kessler, Taylor, Jean Pascal, Jermain Taylor, Reid

                (all prime)
                If Joe would've fought Jones and Hopkins in their prime, he'd have a better argument.

                Not only this, Joe clearly ducked Froch and retired rather than face him which makes it even worse.

                In summary, Froch shits all over Calzaghe.
                lol..

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by El C@cique@PR View Post
                  Calzaghe is the greates SMW of all time. Froch even thiugh is fun to watch doesnt come close. Calzaghe would had dismantle him. Hell this ols ******* abuser Calzaghe schools him
                  Listen El Quesito, you thought Hatton would beat Pac and you thought Cotto would beat Pac and Tony.

                  If you pay for my ticket, I'll fly to puerto ricko, open up your mongoloid skull with a saw and take a **** on your peanut brain.

                  Invitame wey.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    froch clearly has a better resume than calzaghe as do most boxers cept maybe berto and chavez jr.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by INSECT View Post
                      Listen El Quesito, you thought Hatton would beat Pac and you thought Cotto would beat Pac and Tony.

                      If you pay for my ticket, I'll fly to puerto ricko, open up your mongoloid skull with a saw and take a **** on your peanut brain.

                      Invitame wey.
                      By the way. I thought you liked Calzaghe.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP