Interesting video on drug test issue

[al-Xander]

Wow 51 pages of the same back-and-forth PED
debates. You'd recognize the same participants.

If only Pac fanboys just stop responding to these
threads there wouldn't be any of this ping-pong
arguments. Let the other have the last word. Who
cares? Pacquiao is a victim of malicious accusation
started by the Mayweather family. It's wrong. Pac
fans don't have to defend anything. Period. Let
the haters hate. Nothing you and I can do about
it. You'd feel sorry for people like that.

[Dynamite Kid]

I actually thought you might have something of substance to say. Anyway, someone post the last half of that fight. What you'll see is a very, very sloppy fighter. And when you see that he can't seem to remember to keep his head moving - in a fight after that second Barrera fight you're referring to - you'll see what I mean. Manny is more judicious in the use of his right But he's always been a fabulous counterpuncher.

Well I dont know which Pacquaio you have been watching for the last how many years. Why hasn't Manny put on a clinic of counter punching like that before?

If Pac had fought a counter puncher like JMM since the rematch, and looked stellar, then you might be able to assert something fishy, but most the the guys he is beating, has look spectacular against, are aggressive pressure fighters.

You could take Pac from any point in his career, put him in with that version of JMM from the second fight, and JMM would still give him hell, and thats with or without steroids.

[Dynamite Kid]

...........................

[FerdinandMarcos]

its ok. the damage is already done to floyd. only *****s believe on their own belief and the rest of the world believe floyd ducked. and the *****s cannot do anything about it. they can say what ever they say but they cannot change what the world believes. sorry *****s.

Go to the kennel and adopt a puppy for lunch you ****less little Goblin.

[FerdinandMarcos]

[QUOTE=davis828;9509714]

That would apply if Morales was being talked about, but it was you stating that PWill was scared to fight Clottey.



If Mosley was never an option, Why would he be mention by Pacquiao's team, specifically Roach, in interview after interview? Now you're lying and it's okay, I'm accustomed to hearing lies from Pacquiao and his faithful supporters.



Sheer ignorance, brick. Sheer ignorance. I feel bad for you.



Can you name one that Clottey beat? How about Mosley? How about Margarito? I'll give you a hint; you can't name a single fighter for Clottey.




It doesn't matter, he was talking with Foreman about another title fight weeks after he told that lie about not exceeding in weight. Then he still went up to '47, didn't fight who he was suppose to... and now, he's going up even further. He lied, it's okay, you should be accustomed to it by now.





Brick strikes again.



Good job, brick.



And Cotto didn't want to fight at a catchweight, especially when Roach proposed the weight at '43. That was the intial weight. Cotto said he couldn't go lower than '46. That's when Roach wanted '44 and he eventually suckered him into '45, all while ignoring Mosley's request to fight at '43 and '40. The analogy makes perfect sense for this scenario. Roach knew Cotto wouldn't be dumb enough to fight at '43 after his poor showing against Clottey and he talked him into the exact spot he wanted him.



Clearly you didn't watch DLH-Forbes when they fought at '50. So as soon as you do that, you'll understand why Roach wanted him at '47. For the same reason he wanted Cotto at '45. Brick.

You tore brick a new ass.

[FerdinandMarcos]

How do you know that? You in a habit of checkin other people genitals??

Pinoys ain't packin'...