How Many Pacquiao Opponents Had 6inch Height And Reach Disadvantages?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Blooper
    ooops...
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 1668
    • 239
    • 140
    • 8,833

    #51
    Originally posted by No Ceilings
    Wait are you telling me Pac has NEVER been the bigger man in his fight?

    Please tell em thats not what your saying.

    In my thread I didnt say Pac has had 6 inches of height and reach on his opponents. I just said there has been several times when Pac was the bigger man. I,e,: Both JMM fights.
    your thread premise was marg's size advantage was a non-issue and that we should get over it because pac has fought smaller opponents.

    so who has pac fought having the same size advantage as margs is what mak was asking.

    i thought that was pretty simple to understand.

    Comment

    • -MAKAVELLI-
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Aug 2008
      • 50080
      • 3,580
      • 2,792
      • 169,000

      #52
      Originally posted by No Ceilings
      Wait are you telling me Pac has NEVER been the bigger man in his fights?

      Please tell me thats not what your saying.

      In my thread I didnt say Pac has had 6 inches of height and reach on his opponents. I just said there has been several times when Pac was the bigger man. I.e: Both JMM fights.


      so now you're comparing the size differential of PAC-Margs to that of PAC-JMM?


      please stop watching boxing

      Comment

      • -MAKAVELLI-
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Aug 2008
        • 50080
        • 3,580
        • 2,792
        • 169,000

        #53
        Originally posted by Blooper
        your thread premise was marg's size advantage was a non-issue and that we should get over it because pac has fought smaller opponents.

        so who has pac fought having the same size advantage as margs is what mak was asking.

        i thought that was pretty simple to understand.


        it is simple...but Burner needs special help...i should have posted pictures to help but **** it...let him get dizzy thinking about it

        Comment

        • Blooper
          ooops...
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 1668
          • 239
          • 140
          • 8,833

          #54
          Originally posted by -pound4pound-
          it is simple...but Burner needs special help...i should have posted pictures to help but **** it...let him get dizzy thinking about it
          dunno man but he's trying really hard to discredit this fight.

          i guess i shouldn't be surprised but damn.

          Comment

          • B.U.R.N.E.R
            ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 30197
            • 1,346
            • 400
            • 47,475

            #55
            Originally posted by Blooper
            your thread premise was marg's size advantage was a non-issue and that we should get over it because pac has fought smaller opponents.

            so who has pac fought having the same size advantage as margs is what mak was asking.

            i thought that was pretty simple to understand.
            The point is Pac has been the bigger man in his fights before. So now all of sudden when he fights Margarito people are acting like this is David vs. Goliath.

            Its not. Marg doesnt use his height.

            And how much did it look Clottey weighed to you? 165?

            And Pac had him scared to throw. And on top of that Clottey is stronger than Margarito and even bullied Margarito when they fought until he hurt his hand.

            Comment

            • B.U.R.N.E.R
              ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 30197
              • 1,346
              • 400
              • 47,475

              #56
              Originally posted by Blooper
              dunno man but he's trying really hard to discredit this fight.

              i guess i shouldn't be surprised but damn.
              Why should Pac get credit? I can chat about this with you since you are mature and not name calling like a 12 year old. So lets talk boxing. Explain to me why Pac deserves credit.

              Comment

              • -MAKAVELLI-
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Aug 2008
                • 50080
                • 3,580
                • 2,792
                • 169,000

                #57
                Originally posted by Blooper
                dunno man but he's trying really hard to discredit this fight.

                i guess i shouldn't be surprised but damn.


                of course he is...this dude has bet incorrectly to almost all PAC fights...i remember when he was acting like an honorary Brit when PAC was about to fight Ricky...i guess it finally sunk in; its better to not give credit than to be proven an idiot with your picks

                Comment

                • Ragnar Lothbrok
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 6329
                  • 532
                  • 573
                  • 7,422

                  #58
                  Originally posted by No Ceilings
                  Why should Pac get credit? I can chat about this with you since you are mature and not name calling like a 12 year old. So lets talk boxing. Explain to me why Pac deserves credit.
                  this ****** asss ran away from his own ****** asss ridiculous thread.

                  Comment

                  • Blooper
                    ooops...
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 1668
                    • 239
                    • 140
                    • 8,833

                    #59
                    Originally posted by No Ceilings
                    The point is Pac has been the bigger man in his fights before. So now all of sudden when he fights Margarito people are acting like this is David vs. Goliath.

                    Its not. Marg doesnt use his height.

                    And how much did it look Clottey weighed to you? 165?

                    And Pac had him scared to throw. And on top of that Clottey is stronger than Margarito and even bullied Margarito when they fought until he hurt his hand.
                    whether you agree with it or not, margs has a major size and reach advantage.

                    whether he can use it to his advantage or not is another story.

                    i'm sorry burner but my head's starting to hurt trying to explain this to you.

                    Comment

                    • -MAKAVELLI-
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Aug 2008
                      • 50080
                      • 3,580
                      • 2,792
                      • 169,000

                      #60
                      Originally posted by No Ceilings
                      Why should Pac get credit? I can chat about this with you since you are mature and not name calling like a 12 year old. So lets talk boxing. Explain to me why Pac deserves credit.



                      anyone who uses Antonio Margarito as a tune-up, stay busy fight deserves credit for getting a win


                      ESPECIALLY when that person has a 6inch height and reach disadvantage




                      you can leave now

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP