Wow...wtf?!?!

[purecyse]

This answers nothing. Please answer my question with something other than another question.

"in other words, he's done nothing at 168" is not a question. it is a clear statement. the only fighter he's beat is a fighter who had just been knocked out in his previous fight. it wasn't hard to tell before the bout that jermaine taylor was reaching the end of his rope.

then abraham goes and loses to dirrell by disqualification after losing just about every round of that fight.

if the ring rankings are based on achievement, it would make no sense to rank him over a fighter that has been campaigning at 168 for 4 years and had only lost to the VERY BEST 168 pounders (joe calzaghe and lucian bute) before he was disqualified in a fight he was dominating.

[Sweet Jesus]

Why is JT>Those guys?

Who has JT beaten at 168? Jeff Lacy?

C'mon...........Really?

Try again.

So you think Jaidon Codrigton, Sam Soliman, and Peter Manfredo would have beaten JT at 168?

Gotcha.

[jrosales13]

So you think Jaidon Codrigton, Sam Soliman, and Peter Manfredo would have beaten JT at 168?

Gotcha.

I am saying Bika could.

And, Soliman could have given JT problems. Possibly even beat him.

By the time JT got to 168 he just wasn't all that.

[oaklandstephen]

Ok...so I'm watching the replay of Bute-Brinkley and Klitchko-Briggs, which I had recorded on my DVR, when I noticed that The Ring magazine ranked the 168ers and to my ABSOLUTE FCUKING SHOCK...they had Sakio Bika ranked higher than Arthur Abraham...wow.............wow. Can someone please explain this absurdity to me please?!

they have bute above ward so u know they dont know what there doing