Ok...so I'm watching the replay of Bute-Brinkley and Klitchko-Briggs, which I had recorded on my DVR, when I noticed that The Ring magazine ranked the 168ers and to my ABSOLUTE FCUKING SHOCK...they had Sakio Bika ranked higher than Arthur Abraham...wow.............wow. Can someone please explain this absurdity to me please?!
Wow...wtf?!?!
Collapse
-
-
you are aware that the only person that abraham has beaten at 168 is jermaine taylor, right? the same jermaine taylor that also hadn't won a fight at 168 besides, maybe, that lacy fight.Ok...so I'm watching the replay of Bute-Brinkley and Klitchko-Briggs, which I had recorded on my DVR, when I noticed that The Ring magazine ranked the 168ers and to my ABSOLUTE FCUKING SHOCK...they had Sakio Bika ranked higher than Arthur Abraham...wow.............wow. Can someone please explain this absurdity to me please?!
in other words, he's done nothing at 168. -
This answers nothing. Please answer my question with something other than another question.Comment
-
Abraham was a middleweight.
He has 2 fights at 168. One was his KO of Taylor, which wasnt that meaningful.
And his 2nd was the di****able DQ loss to Dirrell.
bika has campaigned for years at 168 and has several notable winsComment
-
As usual, people talk a fighter up, in this case Bika, and have no evidence to back them up.
Who has Bika beaten? Jaidon Codrigton? Peter Manfredo? Sam ****ing Soliman?
Common guys, I know you're better than that.Comment
-
Thank you...finally somebody speaks some sense. Jermaine Taylor>>>>>>codrington, sulaiman etc...cmon guys, he's the lowest ranked super sixer why??? Gimme a break.Comment
Comment