Why are you guys acting like Pascal destroyed Dawson?

[r.burgundy]

Well can anyone explain.

maybe cause pascal wasnt supposed to win at all

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Its probably because Dawson's performance was so poor when he should be dominating guys like Pascal.

[Gorilla Dogs]

Its probably because Dawson's performance was so poor when he should be dominating guys like Pascal.

he didnt have a poor performance, pascal just had a great performance



it wasnt a blow out but pascal just won the fight.


i never claimed he dominated him

[BetterCallSaul]

You guys were acting like Dawson was the next coming of Christ. The fact is, he is just another overrated American, who failed to produce the goods against a non 38+ fighter. And it was a non 38+ fighter with a clear loss to Carl Froch at that.

Dawson isn't as good as everybody makes him out to be. He's a timid, defensive, and somewhat slick contender at best.

[4773Y350NM3]

when you are highly favored to win but got beat by your opponent, that's essentially the same as saying you got destroyed.

its funny as hell how people gave pascal no chance of beating dawson, then come fight night he got beat decisively

[FloydTBE]

Vry intersting stats

[Gorilla Dogs]

you guys discredit the compubox statistics when it comes to Mayweather vs Castillo but now your trying to use this arguement



So floyd really lost the first fight with Castillo?

[Tha_Greatest]

you guys discredit the compubox statistics when it comes to Mayweather vs Castillo but now your trying to use this arguement



So floyd really lost the first fight with Castillo?

compubox is made up stats used to make hbo fighters look good at their convenience like mayweather de la hoya

[Sweet Jesus]

You guys were acting like Dawson was the next coming of Christ. The fact is, he is just another overrated American, who failed to produce the goods against a non 38+ fighter. And it was a non 38+ fighter with a clear loss to Carl Froch at that.

Dawson isn't as good as everybody makes him out to be. He's a timid, defensive, and somewhat slick contender at best.

Adamek was 38+?

[Dan...]

You guys were acting like Dawson was the next coming of Christ. The fact is, he is just another overrated American, who failed to produce the goods against a non 38+ fighter. And it was a non 38+ fighter with a clear loss to Carl Froch at that.

Dawson isn't as good as everybody makes him out to be. He's a timid, defensive, and somewhat slick contender at best.

God that is some rubbish right there.

You guys are incredible. A guy has one off night and loses a close fight to a top contender after beating the best the division has to offer for years and he is a "timid, defensive, contender".

Do yourself a favour champ and stick to football, you know nothing about boxing.