I simply said that Ward was unproven at that time, which was true, and that he couldn't be judged until he had fought a top contender, which was also true. Lots of fighters have looked good on their way up and then been exposed as soon as they fought a good fighter. And plenty of Olympic Gold medallists have failed as pros - e.g. Audley Harrison.
Kessler was ranked #1 at the time by every independent rankings body including The Ring, and by every boxing journalist; so you presumably think they were all on his nuts as well.
I did not say Kessler would win, I only said he should be the favourite, and every boxing journalist in the world agreed with me. But favourites often lose, especially when the opponent is an unknown quantity at the top level. You just hated Kessler because of the colour of his skin, because you're a racist. Whereas I like Ward, I simply said he was unproven as a pro.
And Ward wasn't seriously overweight and out of training, so comparing him with Solis is laughable. Question for you: if Solis is beaten badly by Vitali next year, will you give Vitali props, or will you claim that Solis was a bum?
Kessler was ranked #1 at the time by every independent rankings body including The Ring, and by every boxing journalist; so you presumably think they were all on his nuts as well.
I did not say Kessler would win, I only said he should be the favourite, and every boxing journalist in the world agreed with me. But favourites often lose, especially when the opponent is an unknown quantity at the top level. You just hated Kessler because of the colour of his skin, because you're a racist. Whereas I like Ward, I simply said he was unproven as a pro.
And Ward wasn't seriously overweight and out of training, so comparing him with Solis is laughable. Question for you: if Solis is beaten badly by Vitali next year, will you give Vitali props, or will you claim that Solis was a bum?
Comment