Miguel Cotto (2007) vs Ricky Hatton (2007), who wins at 147 lbs?

[shade darkar]

hatton would have had no chance against cotto @ 147. But @ 140 id of give cotto very little chance.

[sweetpea87]

Miguel Cotto

[Danny Gunz]

147 = goodnight Hatton

[Spacey1991]

Miguel Cotto 31-0
[IMG]http://www.********911.com/files/publisher/Miguel-Cotto-111409L.jpg?0[/IMG]

Vs

Ricky Hatton 43-0
[IMG]http://www.******media.com/images/ricky-hatton280x390.jpg[/IMG]

Cotto IMO, he was just that little bit stronger I think, especially at WW.

[the mesiah]

graham would have no plan for cotto. cotto by 1st body shot then hook to the head.

[IronDanHamza]

I would have actually loved to have seen this fight, could have possibly been a war. I'd go with Cotto by late stoppage.

[dj Ramos]

cotto kills hatton at 147, hatton may have a chance at 140.

[blaze778]

Would have been a war while it lasted.

Cotto wins by TKO in the mid to late rounds.

[puga]

cotto would beat hatton at any weight and any version!

[savorduhflavor]

Cotto embarrasses Hatton at eithe weight.

I mean, what version of Cotto at 140 do people think Hatton would beat? The version that fought Malignaggi? MAYBE, and even that I doubt.

But the version that fought...say, Randall Bailey? Come on, Hatton has no chance, Cotto would walk through him with very little problem.