How Would You Rate The Current Heavyweight Division

**Webber676** · 10-16-2010, 11:31 PM

Without offense... the worst in history.

**Rick Grimes** · 10-16-2010, 11:33 PM

Emanuel Steward says it's the worst he's ever seen and he's the champs trainer, that says a lot.

**bcfc.** · 10-16-2010, 11:34 PM

Originally posted by Mr. Blobby

Emanuel Steward says it's the worst he's ever seen and he's the champs trainer, that says a lot.

I have to agree with him on that.

**FloydTBE** · 10-16-2010, 11:37 PM

Mediocre , atm

**Scott9945** · 10-16-2010, 11:44 PM

I chose mediocre. Besides the K brothers, you have Haye, Povetkin, and Adamek. That's not that much, but it isn't the worst ever either.

**FloydTBE** · 10-16-2010, 11:47 PM

it aint a deep division, got 3/4 good fgihetrs, rest are bums

**Spray_resistant** · 10-16-2010, 11:56 PM

Its not great but only because the contenders have been beaten or are to scared to fight for the title.

That period when Byrd was the best HW and I guess Ruiz was the #2 guy for a while had to be the worst ever.

**crold1** · 10-17-2010, 12:02 AM

Originally posted by Webber676

Without offense... the worst in history.

Not quite...look up some of the top tens between Marciano and Patterson (pre-Liston and Williams seriously rising). The early 1930s was at least as bad as well and didn't have a Klitschko type up top.

**Kevin Malone** · 10-17-2010, 12:07 AM

Steelhammer voted excellent only for the fact that he just found out about the Klitschko brothers very gay photo shoot from a couple years ago.

How Would You Rate The Current Heavyweight Division