Tito Trinidad ****** at..........

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • B.U.R.N.E.R
    ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 30197
    • 1,346
    • 400
    • 47,475

    #21
    Originally posted by jrosales13
    The 1993-98 version of Tito against this version of Floyd?
    I just dont trust Tito against a guy with that kind of speed, movement, defense and handspeed. Floyd would cause major problems for Tito.

    Tito has no defense for jabs. Floyd would shoot the jab to the belly and head and dictate the distance and pace of the fight. He would also make his left hook non existent. I think thats a bad matchup for Tito.

    Comment

    • B.U.R.N.E.R
      ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2010
      • 30197
      • 1,346
      • 400
      • 47,475

      #22
      Originally posted by Dambala
      Floyd is the best active fighter but at WW Tito would've beat him. And don't mention Oscar who would've beat Floyd too.
      Like I typed to Jro I disagree on Tito beating Floyd.

      I REALLY disagree with Oscar beating Floyd. This guy lost to everyone. Floyd would be the best fighter hes ever faced. Floyd would embarrass him.

      Comment

      • jrosales13
        undisputed champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 32632
        • 739
        • 763
        • 40,023

        #23
        Originally posted by INSECT
        Floyd doesn't sign the contract. But if he did, he'd leave the ring without his head intact.
        Eh.... Floyd would of gave him problems.

        But, this version of Floyd has slip some, and gets hit more. Tito would of landed and I am not sure how Floyd would of taken tham. I honestly don't think Shane hits as hard as Tito does. And, I also don't think Shane is a dynamic puncher like Tito was with BOTH hands. Also Tito had a better jab.

        Plus this is not even fair to Floyd either. This is Floyd 4th weight-class, while Tito best weight-class.

        Maybe this version of Floyd beats the late 98-99 version of Tito at WW. Because, Tito was struggling heave to make 147. He was actually weakening himself. However the 93-97 version of Tito beats Floyd. He has more in his arsenal then Shane does. Especially that version of Shane

        Now if we talking about the 05-06 version of Floyd against any welterweight version of Tito then I think that is more debatable. However, I would slightly favor Tito. People forget how good of a WW Tito was. He was just a beast.

        And, Tito did actually have a good jab, went to the body, and actually had solid head movement. He could slip, avoid punches. He was no defensive wizard but did have OK D. However, like most punchers he fell in love with his power and for got about the fundamentals. If you look at Tito early years you would notice he did do stuff OK. But, then when he fell in love with his power he just looked for destruction. And, that was the start of his demise to go along with him moving up weight-classes like that.

        And, the only reason he kept moving up was to fight Roy Jones in 2002. The balls of the guy....

        Comment

        • andres aza
          Banned
          • Dec 2008
          • 683
          • 86
          • 7
          • 929

          #24
          Floyd makes Tito look like a B level fighter. Hed JAB the **** out of Tito. The jab would take Tito's back out. Maybe a Tito before the Bhop fight has a chance

          Comment

          • cotto16
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 2097
            • 26
            • 28
            • 8,852

            #25
            Originally posted by No Ceilings
            Like I typed to Jro I disagree on Tito beating Floyd.

            I REALLY disagree with Oscar beating Floyd. This guy lost to everyone. Floyd would be the best fighter hes ever faced. Floyd would embarrass him.
            How would Floyd embarrass a prime Oscar, when he went to a razor thin SD against a 35 year old inactive past prime De La Hoya?

            Comment

            • jrosales13
              undisputed champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2008
              • 32632
              • 739
              • 763
              • 40,023

              #26
              Originally posted by No Ceilings
              I just dont trust Tito against a guy with that kind of speed, movement, defense and handspeed. Floyd would cause major problems for Tito.

              Tito has no defense for jabs. Floyd would shoot the jab to the belly and head and dictate the distance and pace of the fight. He would also make his left hook non existent. I think thats a bad matchup for Tito.
              But, Tito didn't just have a left hook, he also had a right hand to go along with it. Like I said the early version of Tito could hande a jab solidly. And, Tito also had a jab. This version of Floyd also moves less now. He didn't move like he use to.

              I think the 93-97/98 version of Tito is a bad match up for this version of Floyd.

              Comment

              • MiguelDirrell25
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Oct 2010
                • 879
                • 29
                • 0
                • 7,234

                #27
                Originally posted by J-H
                He was also Puerto Rican.

                I think you covered all the other negative things though.
                Really dude ? What's bad about being PR

                Cok suckin racist

                Tito trinidad is an all time great

                Comment

                • IronDanHamza
                  BoxingScene Icon
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 49500
                  • 5,032
                  • 270
                  • 104,043

                  #28
                  Originally posted by cotto16
                  How would Floyd embarrass a prime Oscar, when he went to a razor thin SD against a 35 year old inactive past prime De La Hoya?
                  Really????

                  Comment

                  • jrosales13
                    undisputed champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 32632
                    • 739
                    • 763
                    • 40,023

                    #29
                    Originally posted by cotto16
                    How would Floyd embarrass a prime Oscar, when he went to a razor thin SD against a 35 year old inactive past prime De La Hoya?
                    Yes Oscar was past prime, inactive, and overall IMO just done as a fighter.

                    However, the decision was not razor thin. Just cuz the Nevada judges have a hard on for Oscar doesn't mean that Floyd barely won. Oscar won 3 rounds, 4 if you're just generous and giving Oscar every single benefit of the doubt.

                    That was a clear victory for Floyd. There was no razor thin decision. What a robbery it would have been if they gave that fight to Oscar.

                    Comment

                    • jrosales13
                      undisputed champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 32632
                      • 739
                      • 763
                      • 40,023

                      #30
                      Originally posted by MiguelDirrell25
                      Really dude ? What's bad about being PR

                      Cok suckin racist

                      Tito trinidad is an all time great
                      Read post 11.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP