So Toprank wants us to think the fight will be competitive

[empiricix]

NO guy,cherrypicking is picking a fighter that on paper,or stylistically Ur supposed to beat,true story!!

A fight is a called fight because actual fighting needs to be done by two people in the ring. If we can always predict who will win based on stylistic match-making on paper, then let's just do away with the actual fighting. How many times have we seen upsets? Isn't that what true boxing fans live for, to see people go beyond their physical and stylistic limitations to attain victory and greatness?

If you decide not to watch this fight simply because you believe that it is a mismatch and Pac will win anyway, that's your call. But the joy in being a true boxing fan is seeing actual fights, not merely knowing who stands to win or who won. It's like foregoing having the actual sex just because you already know how it's going to end.

[Gino Ros]

i see article here in luzon that say mosley fight was fluke and real margrito will show up.

[Bushbaby]

A fight is a called fight because actual fighting needs to be done by two people in the ring. If we can always predict who will win based on stylistic match-making on paper, then let's just do away with the actual fighting. How many times have we seen upsets? Isn't that what true boxing fans live for, to see people go beyond their physical and stylistic limitations to attain victory and greatness?

If you decide not to watch this fight simply because you believe that it is a mismatch and Pac will win anyway, that's your call. But the joy in being a true boxing fan is seeing actual fights, not merely knowing who stands to win or who won. It's like foregoing having the actual sex just because you already know how it's going to end.

Who the hell said anything about Pacman??Cherrypicking is going after a fighter ur supposed to beat,Pacman has nothing to do with my argument!!What the ****??We were arguing about the definition of cherrypicking not Pacman,why don't u read & comprehend before getting all defensive!?

[empiricix]

Who the hell said anything about Pacman??Cherrypicking is going after a fighter ur supposed to beat,Pacman has nothing to do with my argument!!What the ****??

From your successive posts, your point of contention was that Pac-Margs is not worth watching since it is a mismatch in favor of Pac, the implication being that Pac and Arum cherry-picked Marg because he is stylistically suited to Pac's strengths. This is supported by your other posts in other threads.

[victorythagr8]

Whoop d hoo,who didn't huh,but ur butthurt because I call the Margarito-Pacman fight for what it is,which is a cherrypicker fighting a cheater at a catchweight for a vacant title,get vex,I don't give a ****,true story!!

so how come its alright for Paul Williams to fight margarito.

How come people still want to see Sergio Martinez to fight margarito.

Actually how come its a known fact that pacquaio really wanted to fight Floyd(who is the best boxer) and agreed to everything and floyd still don't want to fight him. Actually why are we acting like Berto, Timothy bradley is even more better match up even though margarito has a far better resume than both berto and bradley combined.

Really margarito is a ****ing career 147 fighter. Blame the WBC for the vacant title bull****. And its funny just a year ago before pacquaio fought Cotto, that nobody though pacquaio had the balls to fight margarito.

The only reason you mad at this fight because you want Paul Williams to fight pacquaio with a 1 foot height advantage with big reach advantage. Really if pacquaio is such a cherry picker and protected fighter, then won't complain about paul williams trying to fight welterweight fighters, when he fought up to 160 against sergio martinez. Actually won't paul williams fight a super middle fighter or even a light heavyweight fighter since that is the same thing as you wanting pacquaio to fight paul williams.

[Bushbaby]

From your successive posts, your point of contention was that Pac-Margs is not worth watching since it is a mismatch in favor of Pac, the implication being that Pac and Arum cherry-picked Marg because he is stylistically suited to Pac's strengths. This is supported by your other posts in other threads.

Here U go again,I have never,ever said Pacman-Margarito was not worth watching,please go find where I said that!!What I said was that it wasn't a legit title fight,never said it wasn't entertaining!!My argument with that other feller about cherrypicking,U are wrong son!!

[Bushbaby]

so how come its alright for Paul Williams to fight margarito.

How come people still want to see Sergio Martinez to fight margarito.

Actually how come its a known fact that pacquaio really wanted to fight Floyd(who is the best boxer) and agreed to everything and floyd still don't want to fight him. Actually why are we acting like Berto, Timothy bradley is even more better match up even though margarito has a far better resume than both berto and bradley combined.

Really margarito is a ****ing career 147 fighter. Blame the WBC for the vacant title bull****. And its funny just a year ago before pacquaio fought Cotto, that nobody though pacquaio had the balls to fight margarito.

The only reason you mad at this fight because you want Paul Williams to fight pacquaio with a 1 foot height advantage with big reach advantage. Really if pacquaio is such a cherry picker and protected fighter, then won't complain about paul williams trying to fight welterweight fighters, when he fought up to 160 against sergio martinez. Actually won't paul williams fight a super middle fighter or even a light heavyweight fighter since that is the same thing as you wanting pacquaio to fight paul williams.

No,actually I wanted the Punisher to fight Martinez to set the record straight,which he is doing on hbo minus the ppv!!I simply keep it real,Ur being overly defensive & making assumptions without knowing anything!!

[empiricix]

Here U go again,I have never,ever said Pacman-Margarito was not worth watching,please go find where I said that!!What I said was that it wasn't a legit title fight,never said it wasn't entertaining!!My argument with that other feller about cherrypicking,U are wrong son!!

Then please forgive me, dad! I thought that when you called this fight "a bull**** fight" that you meant it was not worth watching. Perhaps it meant something else.

[HARLEM AL]

Here U go again,I have never,ever said Pacman-Margarito was not worth watching,please go find where I said that!!What I said was that it wasn't a legit title fight,never said it wasn't entertaining!!My argument with that other feller about cherrypicking,U are wrong son!!

Playboy those dudes reading comprehension skills are terrible. Why do you bother.

[Bushbaby]

Then please forgive me, dad! I thought that when you called this fight "a bull**** fight" that you meant it was not worth watching. Perhaps it meant something else.

It's all right my child,lol!!No but seriously,the fight should be entertaining,it just shouldn't be for a title,titles are real pfp is mythical,titles shouldn't be given,they should be earned!!so we're cool then right??