LOL. Froch/Abraham for Vacant WBC belt now

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Afactor4
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Aug 2009
    • 630
    • 21
    • 18
    • 7,074

    #11
    Originally posted by Sweet Jesus
    How does it make sense for the #2 and #3 contenders to fight for the belt?
    The belt is vacant, there is no mandatory, and the #1 is gonna be fighting for another belt. Also, the WBC belt has been in the tournament since its inception, and having two members of the tournament who happen to be next in line after the #1 fight for it makes perfect sense to me.

    Comment

    • -Rab
      D.E.P. Felix Castro
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2010
      • 3750
      • 141
      • 136
      • 10,426

      #12
      I approve of this fight. Make me that money Europeans.

      Comment

      • sosolid4u09
        Up and Comer
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Sep 2010
        • 84
        • 6
        • 2
        • 6,114

        #13
        Originally posted by José Sulaimán
        I approve of this fight. Make me that money Europeans.
        you approve? thank god! lets get this fight started then!

        Comment

        • Franco2012
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2010
          • 5626
          • 211
          • 139
          • 12,109

          #14
          Thx God

          Congratulations Cobra on new WBC belt

          Comment

          • -Rab
            D.E.P. Felix Castro
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 3750
            • 141
            • 136
            • 10,426

            #15
            Originally posted by sosolid4u09
            you approve? thank god! lets get this fight started then!
            Of course, every title fight needs my approval. **** the WBO.

            Comment

            • Sweet Jesus
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2009
              • 11512
              • 568
              • 332
              • 13,576

              #16
              Originally posted by Afactor4
              The belt is vacant, there is no mandatory, and the #1 is gonna be fighting for another belt. Also, the WBC belt has been in the tournament since its inception, and having two members of the tournament who happen to be next in line after the #1 fight for it makes perfect sense to me.
              So... it makes no sense. Gotcha.

              Comment

              • Dave Rado
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2008
                • 8064
                • 266
                • 453
                • 14,460

                #17
                Originally posted by Sweet Jesus
                So... it makes no sense. Gotcha.
                His logic eludes me too. It's obvious that their #1 fighting Ward (who is universally ranked #1 by the independent rankings) should be for both belts in any non-corrupt universe. And then the Abraham-Froch winner would fight the unified champion for both belts after that.

                Still I suppose it will all end up the same eventually so it doesn't matter that much. But it's still bullshit.

                Comment

                • Zig Zag.
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jun 2010
                  • 2681
                  • 171
                  • 256
                  • 3,664

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Sweet Jesus
                  I would give the $1500 in my bank account to the winner of the Super 6 if during the postfight interview they lay all the belts on the ground, whip their **** out, and urinate on them.
                  u got nuttin in your bank account



                  you jobless little bitch

                  Comment

                  • The Hammer
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 50797
                    • 3,416
                    • 8,704
                    • 58,851

                    #19
                    Good news!

                    This is the way it should have been in the first place, and it makes the Froch-Abraham fight more interesting and meaningful.

                    Never before could someone who already had the WBA belt fight for a vacant WBC world title. It makes a lot more sense for the winner of Froch-Abraham to be the WBC champion. The titles will be unified in the Super Six final anyway.

                    Comment

                    • {Darko}
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 339
                      • 42
                      • 31
                      • 6,579

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Sweet Jesus
                      I would give the $1500 in my bank account to the winner of the Super 6 if during the postfight interview they lay all the belts on the ground, whip their **** out and urinate in my mouth. After already having deposited their ***** inside my tummy.
                      We all know what you meant.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP