So if Margarito is so easy why did Team Pacquiao refuse 151 and want 149

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HandSpeed303
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2008
    • 4793
    • 125
    • 97
    • 22,213

    #51
    Originally posted by DempseyRollin
    if u think 150 will be good for marg, why doesnt roach and pac's team share your sentiment?? guess they kno something u dont. the fact is even if fighting at 150 doesnt drain marg, it lessens his size advatage over pac, that size advantage is about the only advantage he has. roach is smart, he wants to take away all possible advantages margs has that could potentially lead to an upset. its as clear as day. team pac doesnt ask for these catch weights for no reason, that **** should be obvious by now to everyone who has followed pac for the last few years.
    Well, that is my whole point...Margo will not be drained, and coming in at his best.

    If you want to talk about size advantages, go for it..Not my debate.

    I have already stated my reasons why I think the catchweight was involved. I don't like it. Do I think Margo will be drained, no...

    Comment

    • B.U.R.N.E.R
      ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2010
      • 30197
      • 1,346
      • 400
      • 47,475

      #52
      Originally posted by DempseyRollin
      if u think 150 will be good for marg, why doesnt roach and pac's team share your sentiment?? guess they kno something u dont. the fact is even if fighting at 150 doesnt drain marg, it lessens his size advatage over pac, that size advantage is about the only advantage he has. roach is smart, he wants to take away all possible advantages margs has that could potentially lead to an upset. its as clear as day. team pac doesnt ask for these catch weights for no reason, that **** should be obvious by now to everyone who has followed pac for the last few years.
      Damn this was a great point. Look at his response. He claim he stopped reading after one line. Good ****ing ownage.

      You made an excellent point.

      Comment

      • B.U.R.N.E.R
        ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2010
        • 30197
        • 1,346
        • 400
        • 47,475

        #53
        Originally posted by HandSpeed303
        Well, that is my whole point...Margo will not be drained, and coming in at his best.

        If you want to talk about size advantages, go for it..Not my debate.

        I have already stated my reasons why I think the catchweight was involved. I don't like it. Do I think Margo will be drained, no...
        Do you think it lowers Marg's size advantage. Yes or No.

        Comment

        • HandSpeed303
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2008
          • 4793
          • 125
          • 97
          • 22,213

          #54
          Originally posted by No Ceilings
          Damn this was a great point. Look at his response. He claim he stopped reading after one line. Good ****ing ownage.

          You made an excellent point.
          How did he own me? That post was to you, and I was about to repeat myself. YOu ****ing coward!

          Comment

          • HandSpeed303
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2008
            • 4793
            • 125
            • 97
            • 22,213

            #55
            Originally posted by No Ceilings
            Do you think it lowers Marg's size advantage. Yes or No.
            When in this whole topic have I ever mentioned size? Never. This debate was about draining Margo...I you thing Margo will not still have a size advantage. I incourage you to looke at a few pictures of the two...

            You act as if Margo is going to get shorter or something...

            Comment

            • B.U.R.N.E.R
              ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 30197
              • 1,346
              • 400
              • 47,475

              #56
              Originally posted by HandSpeed303
              Ummm, yes we know that Burner...What is your point? That he will be drained at 150?

              Like I said in my earlier post, 150 just might be good for him. Really....YOu know what, nevermind. You didn't come in here to debate anything.

              You just came to play captin obvious...

              Why don't you quote who you are replying to next time.
              Who said anything about him being drained. The point is it takes way Margs advantage. Which is size.

              What is so hard for you understand about that.

              If 150 was such a good look for him like you claim why didn't he weigh in at 150 vs. Garcia?

              Comment

              • B.U.R.N.E.R
                ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 30197
                • 1,346
                • 400
                • 47,475

                #57
                Originally posted by HandSpeed303
                When in this whole topic have I ever mentioned size? Never. This debate was about draining Margo...I you thing Margo will not still have a size advantage. I incourage you to looke at a few pictures of the two...

                You act as if Margo is going to get shorter or something...
                Lets try this again.

                Does it lowers Margs size advantage. Yes or No?

                Simple question. One word required.

                Im not talking about height. Boxing doesnt have height classes.

                Comment

                • HandSpeed303
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 4793
                  • 125
                  • 97
                  • 22,213

                  #58
                  Originally posted by No Ceilings
                  Damn this was a great point. Look at his response. He claim he stopped reading after one line. Good ****ing ownage.

                  You made an excellent point.
                  Also, before your coweard ass jump on his so called "ownage" I did read the rest of the post, and size was never my debate. Margo being drained was.

                  Comment

                  • gapo
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 858
                    • 30
                    • 5
                    • 7,263

                    #59
                    Margarito did not have to take the fight either. Just as easy as pacquiao said no to 151 pounds.

                    Comment

                    • HandSpeed303
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jul 2008
                      • 4793
                      • 125
                      • 97
                      • 22,213

                      #60
                      Originally posted by No Ceilings
                      Lets try this again.

                      Does it lowers Margs size advantage. Yes or No?

                      Simple question. One word required.
                      NO.

                      Margo still has the height advantage.

                      Longer reach.

                      And will still most likely be heavier.

                      Nice try on stealing another man point.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP