Morales, Pacquiao, Barrera...who's the best?

[domzkidot]

pac man definitely, he tkod both of em,

[JaNnO]

only time will tell but how things are looking for pac, it is very likely that he will surpassed these two mexican greats. first of all, he has beaten both of them in a one-sided fashion including the fighter thay have been avoiding for so long (although it was a draw, thanks to a judging error). but let records show for now that pac is on top of the heap among them:

w-l-d
pac 2-1-1
mab 2-2-0
em 2-2-0
jmm 0-0-1

[Chups]

only time will tell but how things are looking for pac, it is very likely that he will surpassed these two mexican greats. first of all, he has beaten both of them in a one-sided fashion including the fighter thay have been avoiding for so long (although it was a draw, thanks to a judging error). but let records show for now that pac is on top of the heap among them:

w-l-d
pac 2-1-1
mab 2-2-0
em 2-2-0
jmm 0-0-1

em 2-3-0

............................

[kadyo's]

Barrera!

#1. Barrera beat Morales
#2. Barrera underestimated Pacquiao and didnt know much about his style (he lost fair and square)
#3. JMM exposed Pacquiao so then Morales knew how to beat him
#4. Now Barrera nows how to beat him....
#5. Pacquiao is exposed of that one dimensional fighter that he is now, in a rematch Barrera will have NO problem..

haha! funny how time flies so fast!!!

[JaNnO]

thanks for the correction chups, wassup bro?

[morancito]

whos beaten all of the above? nuff' said

Um, Eric Morales?

Jesus Christ, can't you even remember what happened last year?

[JaNnO]

Um, Eric Morales?

Jesus Christ, can't you even remember what happened last year?

i think he meant to say that pac has beaten all of them. even though he lost to morales last year, he revenged that loss this year. technically, he pac drew with jmm but it was a toss up for some people. he probably saw pac winning that fight and he should have if not due to a judging error.

peace out!

[morancito]

i think he meant to say that pac has beaten all of them. even though he lost to morales last year, he revenged that loss this year. technically, he pac drew with jmm but it was a toss up for some people. he probably saw pac winning that fight and he should have if not due to a judging error.

peace out!

The poll doesn't include Juan Manuel Marquez. It's Pac, MAB or Eric. That poster's argument to choose Pacquiao was that he had beaten "all of the above", meaning MAB and Morales, of course. Well, Morales has beaten both MAB and Pac. So his comment is uninformed at best, or reveals a serious problem of medium-term memory, at worst.

[SuckaPunch]

The poll doesn't include Juan Manuel Marquez. It's Pac, MAB or Eric. That poster's argument to choose Pacquiao was that he had beaten "all of the above", meaning MAB and Morales, of course. Well, Morales has beaten both MAB and Pac. So his comment is uninformed at best, or reveals a serious problem of medium-term memory, at worst.

It's HOW you beat them. Morales' wins were close decisions. Pac's wins were total destructions.

Case and point, if Morales lost last Saturday through a close decision, he still would've been top10 P4P by the Ring Magazine and Pac wouldn't have surpassed Barrera for the #3 spot.

As I repeat, it's HOW you beat 'em.

[kg21mvp]

I'm sure if Morales was the first to fight Pacquiao that he would have lost as well....

Pacquiao is overrated..

bacause pacman got mad skillz to boot.. your barrera is boring man he box like a woman he hugs everybody when..pacman for me is the best coz he humiliated barrera hahaha..dont hate the playa hate the game!