Originally posted by J.M.Marquez
you say i make it out to seem that barrera has won two fights and im right, thats a fact, im not making it out to seem like that because its true.
the reason why people think morales is better than bareera is because of the way morales fights, he entertains us, thrills us, he wants us wanting more, hes easily one of if not THE most exciting fighter today, but this shouldnt cloud peoples judgements into thinking he is better than barrera. barreras record of fights and top quality opposition is similar to morales, no one can deny this, barrera is also a 3 weight champion..... just like morales, they are basically eachothers equals. however, barrera beatin him twice and in my opinion barrera goin up in weight and defeating morales at 130lbs is a far greater achievement than what morales has done. i aint even knocking morales, he is a GREAT fighter but i just cant see how people think hes better than barrera when they have similiar resumes, are both 3 weight champions and barrera has beaten him more times.
thats just like me fighting someone, i beat them up but because they have beaten up people i cant beat up there better then me?? it just dont make sense, if i beat someone up i should be the better fighter so why cant you see this in barreras case??
Comment