It's a boxers job to protect themselves at all times right?
It's Vitali's own fault for not protecting his face, you can't blame the skin of the fighter.
For example, don't know how long you've followed boxing but Vito Antuofermo was a very good fighter but notorious for getting cut ALOT (so much so that he had an operation to file down his bone to stop from getting cuts) would you say that he would have beaten Hagler (the first time) and Alan Minter if he didn't get cut? You cannot just make a assumption like that. 'The only reason he lost to Minter and drew to Hagler was because of bad skin'
What a silly assumption to make.
It's Vitali's own fault for not protecting his face, you can't blame the skin of the fighter.
For example, don't know how long you've followed boxing but Vito Antuofermo was a very good fighter but notorious for getting cut ALOT (so much so that he had an operation to file down his bone to stop from getting cuts) would you say that he would have beaten Hagler (the first time) and Alan Minter if he didn't get cut? You cannot just make a assumption like that. 'The only reason he lost to Minter and drew to Hagler was because of bad skin'
What a silly assumption to make.
Comment