9/10/2010 Floyd Mayweather vs. Josie Harris III: REASONABLE DOUBT

[Pullcounter]

[IMG]http://i30.***********.com/albums/c318/Quntel/0910-mayweather-ex-01-wm.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://i30.***********.com/albums/c318/Quntel/josie-harris-18441.jpg[/IMG]

Why Does Josie Harris always make it seem Mayweathers Fights using female tactics.
Pull's Her Hair
Kick her in the stomach
Pulled her Arm
and Threaten to kill her.

If you ever been around these kind of situations you would know that
Men dont pull hair, biitches pulled hair. Thats a tactic Females used when they are fighting. They strach, grap, and pulled.
Men Punch, Slap, or hold.

But nonetheless, Josie always seems to describe the same altercation all three times she has charged Mayweather with beating her.
Is it me, or does it seem like she was probably the pulling, straching, and grabing somebodies hair.

In 2003-2005
Josie Harris accepted all the blame for the Dec. 27, 2003, conflict. Which she testified unfolded after she partied with friends and consumed Ecstasy, an illicit stimulant.

Josie Harris downed shots of alcohol and half of an Ecstasy tablet at a nightclub, then stepped into Floyd Mayweather Jr.'s luxurious black Bentley.

She portrayed herself as a scorned and inebriated woman who called police to the nightclub so she would have the upperhand if Mayweather pursued criminal charges against her for her outburst. The 25-year-old woman often giggled while testifying she lied when she told authorities that Mayweather had beaten her. Harris' retraction dealt a serious blow to prosecutors and cost them their star witness.

Josie claim Mayweather Pulled her hair, kicked her, and threaten to kill her.

In 2010
Josie claims Mayweather Pulled her hair, kicked her, and threaten to kill her
"pulling me by my hair and throwing me on the ground in my living room and began punching me in my head."

She claims Floyd then began "dragging me on the floor and twisting my arm back ... in attempt to try and break it."


Now for some reason, I have reasonable doubt to believe this story for the third time by Ms. Harris

Just like in 2005, one jury said if we have enough Reasonable doubt, and you can't convict someone when there's a lot of reasonable doubt.

So do you have REASONABLE DOUBT to believe Josie Harris story this time?

WHERE THERE'S SMOKE THERE'S FIRE!!!!

Floyd been beating up on this chick since 2003.

[Gorilla Dogs]

threatened to kill her? GEEZ MAN. floyd has hit a new low

[The Gambler1981]

They wont put the kid on the stand but they will definitely allow this as evidence if it goes to trial. Best bet for floyd is his lawyers get it thrown out.

Floyd's best bet is to hope no charges are felony and hope he can make it go away with cash. His lawyer's should be able to make that happean though, but Floyd does have priors against women so who knows.

[THE REED]

It is a broken home dude~ and how many kids does Floyd have. New flash they aren't the Brady bunch or the Partridge family no matter how much loot Floyd has.

You get nothing from me..

[The Big Dunn]

Floyd's best bet is to hope no charges are felony and hope he can make it go away with cash. His lawyer's should be able to make that happean though, but Floyd does have priors against women so who knows.

I think in Nevada they have to charge you with a felony after the 2nd incident. Yeah its probably gonna cost him alot of cash. His video rant did him no favors either. And you cant be sure if the chick changes her story again too. Obviously she can be bought.

[ThunderWolf]

There is no motive for a child witness to lie. End of Thread.

[jrosales13]

Jro,
Why so mad man...?
You be on my head more than any poster on this board..

when did the hate begin?
just curious?

Hate begin? Don't be ridiculous. You not important enough to be hated on man. Just cuz posters criticize your posts or your knowledge doesn't mean is hate.

I think your knowledge is very limited. I don't think you can talk in depth about the overall sport of boxing.Because, since I have been here you haven't.

Is not hate at all. Is just that you're basically troll. No better than CungLe, Pasawayako, MIC, or Yesir. The only difference is that you write an essay trying to seem smart and use colorful fonts. But, in reality you're no different from them. You just really a troll.

He mad bro, straight salty.

He's been mad since I exposed him not knowing what ring generalship is.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggggggggggggggg gggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhht.

[Dick Buffman]

Hate begin? Don't be ridiculous. You not important enough to be hated on man. Just cuz posters criticize your posts or your knowledge doesn't mean is hate.

I think your knowledge is very limited. I don't think you can talk in depth about the overall sport of boxing.Because, since I have been here you haven't.

Is not hate at all. Is just that you're basically troll. No better than CungLe, Pasawayako, MIC, or Yesir. The only difference is that you write an essay trying to seem smart and use colorful fonts. But, in reality you're no different from them. You just really a troll.



Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggggggggggggggg gggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhht.

CungLe=CungLeGEND.

He's leagues above Whoreus.

[The Gambler1981]

You get nothing from me..

Everything I said was pretty much true and didn't even really have to try hard to create even a bit of doubt.

In a trial a big thing is the credibility of witnesses, if it can be proven that this kid was upset because Floyd wasn't making him his favorite then his testimony means like nothing.

And his baby-moma please.


Anyways Floyd probably did lay hands on her but he is not in an unwinnable situation in a court of law if certain aspects can be proven or brought up, in the court of public opinion he is boned but that really didn't change that much except that people can now actually point to some real recent bad behavior as opposed to getting twisted up over Floyd saying some bull****.

[THE REED]

Everything I said was pretty much true and didn't even really have to try hard to create even a bit of doubt.

In a trial a big thing is the credibility of witnesses, if it can be proven that this kid was upset because Floyd wasn't making him his favorite then his testimony means like nothing.

And his baby-moma please.


Anyways Floyd probably did lay hands on her but he is not in an unwinnable situation in a court of law if certain aspects can be proven or brought up, in the court of public opinion he is boned but that really didn't change that much except that people can now actually point to some real recent bad behavior as opposed to getting twisted up over Floyd saying some bull****.

I don't care about what loophole they find in court.

His own SON admitted to what happened.. I don't care about technicality loopholes... I'm not a lawyer and I don't work in a courtroom.

The point is... that **** HAPPENED.