How many great undefeated fighters has Pacquiao beat?

[Jack Napier]

Mayweather beat corrales and hatton when they both were on top of there games.

It seems like the guys Pacquiao beat were either shot, weight drained, or coming off a loss.


He beat some great fighters but none were undefeated and in there prime.

Corrales and Hatton were good
you're ****** if you think either of them were great though
Pac-Barrera 1>any win of Floyd's
and OMG, Marco wasn't even unbeaten!

[straightleft]

Ummmm, JMM called Floyd out on live TV and agreed to everything.


Ummmm, Ricky technically called Floyd out on live TV and agreed to everything.

Did he agrees and knows Floyd will come fight night 3 lbs overweight of their weight contractual agreement from the very start of the negotiation?

Did Ricky also agreed that he is going to be koed by the ring post?

[kadyo's]

threads like this are no better than the dumbass threads *******s make...cant we just talk boxing

I agree with you, Larryx.

[mathed]

arum prevented marg and cotto b.c he didnt want to pay. not floyd

this image........

[Left Hook Tua]

He beat Jorge Solis and Emmanuel Lucero. But neither of them was world champ or ever became world champ. So the answer is zero.

Btw, His name is Poochiao not Pacquiao.

actually solis won a 130 title.

[ADP02]

hatton makes a lot of excuses after fights

hatton was 152 when he fight at 140 and 152 when he fight at 147.

which is better?

Hatton makes a lot of excuses after fight? Anyways, you just need to look at his record and ask anyone around to understand in which division Hatton belonged.

At 147: Wins = 1 , Losses = 1, KOs= 0
At 140: Wins = 44, Losses = 1, KOs= 32


As for the weight numbers you just stated in your comment, it doesn't mean that that person is better off fighting at 147. Actually, it could mean that he should fight at 140, if he trained properly.

At 140, Hatton could use his style to wear out his opponents. Against the bigger Floyd at 147, the effects were not the same. Hatton had to do it against a bigger and stronger opponent(Floyd). Plus, Hatton's punches were not as effective at 147.


There have been many cases where the boxer was great in one division but couldn't perform the same once he moved up a division. Hatton was not made for 147. There was NO PROOF that Hatton could perform well at 147.

[joelab75]

both are great fighters and future hall of famers. though Manny fought more future hall of famers. MAB, Morales, JMM, Oscar and Cotto.

Floyd fought 3 hall of famers but way past their primes or old. Oscar, Mosley and a lightweight JMM. im not trying to discredit his resume but if Manny would fight Chris John in Jr Welterweight would that count as a great win? resume wise Manny fought better opponents.

Floyds best win in his resume was against 38 yr old Mosley who lost to Cotto 3 years ago.

[Walterson]

Didn't Floyd move down in weight to fight Hatton? considering he just moved up to fight Oscar De La Hoya.

[TOBYLEE1]

Being undefeated doesn't mean that you are great

[T-97]

ouch, *******s owned ha

Yes bruh.

Pac might have beaten ATGs and HOFers (Barrera, Marquez, De La Hoya etc), but he never beat any unbeaten fighters. Fucking