How many great undefeated fighters has Pacquiao beat?

[gapo]

147 had nothing to do with that fight. hatton was better at 147 because he didnt have to dry down

What,,, who dry what what?

[Pacquiao'd]

margrito.

/

arum prevented marg and cotto b.c he didnt want to pay. not floyd

[AFighter4U]

Mayweather beat corrales and hatton when they both were on top of there games.

It seems like the guys Pacquiao beat were either shot, weight drained, or coming off a loss.


He beat some great fighters but none were undefeated and in there prime.

what's with people's obsession with undefeated boxers? NONE of the top 5 ATGs were undefeated, nor were they undefeated when they were at their prime.

[BUSINESSMAN]

BIGBOXING*** when you're not busy shoving replicas of floyd's baby**** down your throat and/or ass/pusssy consider that making another floyd-pacquiao thread makes you a ***** shaped **** with an erectyle ***********. does this shhit give you a better kick than rolling your ass on a floyd poster every night? ***ggot.

[kenso]

how many great undefeated fighters has any fighter beaten? how many GREAT PRIME fighters has any fighter beaten? the last fight i can remember that a fighter won a fight over a GREAT fighter that was undeniably in their PRIME was lennox lewis over vitali - and lennox really got his ass beat, he just lucked up and cut vitali. given lennox wasn't training hard and vitali took the fight on like 10 day notice so...

you could have said margarito beat cotto, but margs is a cheating bastard.

here is a better question in regards to all fighters: how many times has any said fighter taken on lesser opposition when more lucrative bouts against more dangerous opponents was on the table? these are the fighters that deserve heat.

[ADP02]

147 had nothing to do with that fight. hatton was better at 147 because he didnt have to dry down

I'd prefer to look at Hatton's record and his own words to make up my mind if he was better at 140 or 147. Hatton said after the Floyd fight that there is a difference between the 140 Hatton and the 147 Hatton......

At 147: Wins = 1 , Losses = 1, KOs= 0
At 140: Wins = 44, Losses = 1, KOs= 32

[mushahadeen]

Mayweather beat corrales and hatton when they both were on top of there games.

It seems like the guys Pacquiao beat were either shot, weight drained, or coming off a loss.


He beat some great fighters but none were undefeated and in there prime.

This is what is wrong with Floyd vs. Pac.

To an objective observer, Floyd and Pac are clearly, obviously, indisputably GREAT fighters with GREAT resumes.

But people have become so biased, so hell-bent on discrediting the other fighter, that they make ******ed posts like that referenced above.

Don't be a d1ck. Floyd and Pac are both great and both have great resumes.

[Southpaw Stinger]

Most undefeated fighters nowadays aren't great. Just afraid of losing their '0'

[007geyweather]

Mayweather beat corrales and hatton when they both were on top of there games.

It seems like the guys Pacquiao beat were either shot, weight drained, or coming off a loss.


He beat some great fighters but none were undefeated and in there prime.

He beat Jorge Solis and Emmanuel Lucero. But neither of them was world champ or ever became world champ. So the answer is zero.

Btw, His name is Poochiao not Pacquiao.

ouch, *******s owned ha

You guys base boxers' achievement with undefeated boxers they beat. You guys are ****ing sick! You call yourself boxing fans? GTFOH ******S!!!

[Gino Ros]

I'd prefer to look at Hatton's record and his own words to make up my mind if he was better at 140 or 147. Hatton said after the Floyd fight that there is a difference between the 140 Hatton and the 147 Hatton......

At 147: Wins = 1 , Losses = 1, KOs= 0
At 140: Wins = 44, Losses = 1, KOs= 32

hatton makes a lot of excuses after fights

hatton was 152 when he fight at 140 and 152 when he fight at 147.

which is better?