I reckon the answer has to be: not many.
I genuinely believe he's a lot better than he's reputed to be, and even though he's no all-time great (or ever likely to be) he's got more than enough advantages to deal with anyone out there today. Okay, he's got the loss to Byrd, but that was largely injuries sustained by beating the crap out of him.
I gather that a lot of people think he's ready to be taken, but maddeningly, he's only defended his title once, and against a rank outsider.
But put all the contenders together and who do you think could do it at present? I believe Rahman lacks skill, Peter lacks speed.
Probably the most likely candidate IMO is Lamon Brewster.
In fact, I'll make it a poll. My answer is 3-5... possibly.
I genuinely believe he's a lot better than he's reputed to be, and even though he's no all-time great (or ever likely to be) he's got more than enough advantages to deal with anyone out there today. Okay, he's got the loss to Byrd, but that was largely injuries sustained by beating the crap out of him.
I gather that a lot of people think he's ready to be taken, but maddeningly, he's only defended his title once, and against a rank outsider.
But put all the contenders together and who do you think could do it at present? I believe Rahman lacks skill, Peter lacks speed.
Probably the most likely candidate IMO is Lamon Brewster.
In fact, I'll make it a poll. My answer is 3-5... possibly.
Comment