Tweet
he is regressing instead of progressing....gavern is light years ahead of this tomato can...
-
-
The Klitschkos are my favorite fighters, but my one criticism of them is K-2 has been putting on mediocre undercards this year. In 2010, they had some decent matchups, but so far this year they've not been good.
Banks-Montana is not an interesting fight. -
i agree normally they do put on good cards but banks vs montana is horrible! what does he get fighting him? there are so many other fighters who could give him rounds & yet not be much of a threat...haye,adamek,& banks all moved up around the same time.adamek fought grant,golota,estrada,arreola which to me is very impressive.haye fought barrett,valuev,ruiz which to me is also impressive but banks has fought montana,gavern,zeller,walker...no where near the level of fighters the other 2 fought...gavern & walker are decent journeyman but montana & that kilt wearing clown are tomato cans...i said before the gavern fight that banks does not fit the heavyweight mold.hes put on too much weight & doesnt have hw power.Comment
-
Banks looked awesome against Adamek. It's clear he could be competitive for a few rounds with any heavyweight not named Klitschko. I wouldn't mind seeing Banks-Chambers or Banks-Arreola. Banks-Povetkin would be interesting...Comment
-
too be honest there was areason i bet gavern to beat banks.he looked good vs adamek but he has a weak chin & at heavyweight he is not as fast & doesnt have the same power.he was a big cruiserweight & should have stayed there but i thought he moved up for the money...ive got 8 of his fights.all his hw & 5 cruiserweight fights.i really wasnt impressed at anything he did other then the adamek fight.im not so sure he can beat a contender...time will tell but times a wasting fighting guys like montana.you fight montana when you have been inactive for a few yearsComment
Comment