Bert Sugar "No Fighter In History Has Fought Three Straight In House Fights"

[Chuckguy]

LOL!

So guys, hear this, if you wanna call it an in-house fight, it has to be fought promotionally in-house, ayt?

Hence the term
"IN HOUSE"

just slap yourself

[mrboxer]

what does that have to do with the his statement about "No fighter in the history of the sport has fought three straight in house fights"

as much as floyd is hated if he had really done that **** dan rafeal and doug fisher would have had a tag team orgy crucifying him....


double triple standards and catchweights....

you dont worry about what it has to do with it,i know what it has to do with it,

[..WaRSpencE..]

So the money he pays GBP and those banners they hang in his fights that say GBP are free of charge?

He signs on a fight to fight bases.....

and tell me when Hatton signed with GBP?

DLH hands out free banners now..and also hands out funds for people in serious tax trouble..

De La Hoya for PRESIDENT 2012!!

[Tamis!]

Hence the term
"IN HOUSE"

just slap yourself

I just did!

The whole thing boiled down on in-house stuff! And it got twisted along the way LOL!

[Left Hook Tua]

i don't understand the big deal about things being "in-house fights"

fighters from the same company can fight and still put on a good show.


silly talk.

top rank is one of the biggest promoters out there.

what's the big deal about their fighters fighting each other?


i wish every fighter was with the same company , easier to make fights.

[cortdawg25]

DLH has pulled 1mil+ PPV buys without the help of Mayweather

Tito, Pacquiao, and almost even pulled it off with Mayorga at 925,000 buys!..

Mayweather can't do it with out GPB..and if you think he doesn't pay them everytime he fights..you're in denial..period!

goldenboy and oscar are 2 different things. Oscar and pacquiao was co-promotion between Top Rank and Goldenboy.

and yeah, they get paid. they not doing it for free. But he is not their fighter. They just provide a service.

[bartolomewj]

I get what you are saying and I agree to some degree but I would rather see it as Floyd has fought strictly GBP fighters his last 4 fights not in house
either way he hasnt dealt with anyone else

ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.

Floyd has fought exclusively GBP fighters.

[brick wall]

Yes, they were working together to make the fight, but neither Hatton nor Floyd were GBP fighters.

in-house fight is not just about exclusivity of contract. floyd and hatton signed for one fight with gbp therefore they were gbp fighters for that particular fight. keep trying to twist it but floyd-hatton was a gbp in-house fight. they were bound by a contract and it doesn't matter whether it is for one, two or ten fights.

[Russian Crushin]

Its funny how people are attempting to manipulate facts

Last 4 fights, Floyd was signed to GBP and fought a GBP fighter.

Now we have all these lawyers "proving" this as incorrect

[cortdawg25]

I get what you are saying and I agree to some degree but I would rather see it as Floyd has fought strictly GBP fighters his last 4 fights not in house
either way he hasnt dealt with anyone else

Chuck, that would be accurate to an extent......inhouse fights is nowhere in the ballpark.