C'mon Tunney, you know better than to mash together different quotes out of context. Oh wait, maybe you don't if it gets in the way of your agenda.
The 'slave contract' quote was about the original contracts offered to him, not about the current deal that was negotiated. It was said because of the options the Klitschko camp insisted on.
Which part of the current Klitschko camp offer is 50-50? Assuming what Haye says is true - it's 50-50 without a huge part of the money, which as you know is not 50-50.
Haye should accept it anyway, but I can understand why he won't back down. If anyone is the liar here, it's Wladimir Klitschko, not David Haye. Klitschko said he offered 50-50 and it was turned down, which is incorrect. Klitschko offered 50-50 of the gate, international money and UK money, but it isn't 50-50 without the German money.
Dare you to respond Tunney. I dare you to debate without just re-hashing ther party line.
You'll just say 'Haye is a liar', with no evidence of course, just because you're a blind Klitschko follower. I'll still be angry at Haye if he fights Harrison, but you refuse to be angry at Klitschko for anything. Let's see if the Klitschko comes out and denies what Haye has said. I'm predicting silence.
Sounds like David Haye is full of ****, again. Yes, they are ducking David Haye. David Haye is such an amazingly talented boxer who no one can beat. Did you see how fast and powerful Haye is! Did you see how impressive his defense is? David is greatest fighter alive...
valuev was a nobody in england
collazo , urango , lazcano and mallignagi was nobodies here
even mayweather at the time was relativly unknown to general public but but they all did solid numbers fighting a much loved english fighter on ppv
so the main problem is that the british dont know crap about boxing?
Whats this maximum thing hes going on about, is 50/50 not 50/50 and why did wlad say he offered haye a straight up 50/50 and haye turned it down?? There is something not right here. Haye wasnt happy that wlad is tied to a contract and would have to fight on rtl and haye wanted more money, yet wlad was happy with the money on offer and it was 50/50 so basically haye said i want more as the german market can give me more, is that it?
Both are to blame. From Hayes perspective a 50/50 contract where they keep the money from their respective countries seems pretty fair. However, I can see why the K bros may feel that he doesn't deserve that much of the pie. I dunno, either way they're gonna earn a lot of monies it's a shame neither can just man up and accept a contract.
This is a quote from wlad klit in a recent interview
KLITSCHKO: That was exactly it. In April this year when I officially called out David Haye through the social network YouTube, I just wanted to make it as direct as possible that it’s not my manager talking about it, it’s not my lawyer talking about it, or it’s not a journalist writing down what I said. So I spoke out directly to the boxing fans and to David Haye. Just let’s make it. The deal, it doesn’t matter. 50-50, I agree with that. Just let’s make it. Let’s do it. I was open because the money is not an issue at a certain stage of my career. The challenge and the excitement about the sport, that’s an issue, and we have a huge fan base for this sport and I just want it so that we have one heavyweight champion who unifies all the titles and all the belts. David, let’s make it!
But haye is talking about wanting 50/50 of some maximum in his interview and he didnt explain that so something is going on here
This info isnt new tbh, he was willing to accept a poor deal a few years ago to get the shot saying money didnt matter, now money does matter to him, its real pathetic the deal Wlad offered was not bad at all he should have taken it.
Comment