Floyd is the most skilled fighter of all time.

[Bhopreign]

Second based on prime ability. Alis more athletic, Floyds more skilled.

Wilfred Bentiez was great and a very underrated fighter, I see Floyd as an even better version of him.

Not a bad comparison with Benitez. Before one argues the skill equation you cant help but look at the glaring advantage Floyd will likely have in the defensive department.

[Tamis!]

So you basing it off in terms of skills not greatness right?

Don't be too hard on him he might faint thinking very intently...

[DiLLiNGER]

yea man floyd is the best fighter ..he got skills unlike pacquiao who has no footwork and who blocks punches with his big head hahahahahhahahhahahhaha

[Tyson.]

So you basing it off in terms of skills not greatness right?

Yes.

[Tamis!]

Yes.

If you base it on skill I wanna ask a question...

How (for you) is skill measured?

[jrosales13]

Yes.

Ok if we going by skills and not greatnesss how is Ali the most skilled fighter in all times?

And, if I am following you correctly your rankings for most skilled fighters of all time read like this.

1. Ali
2. Floyd
3. Benitez

Right?

[Bhopreign]

If you base it on skill I wanna ask a question...

How (for you) is skill measured?

Hitting and not getting hit would be a decent premise.

[Tyson.]

Ok if we going by skills and not greatnesss how is Ali the most skilled fighter in all times?

And, if I am following you correctly your rankings for most skilled fighters of all time read like this.

1. Ali
2. Floyd
3. Benitez

Right?

Ali is the greatest based on prime ability. Mayweather is 2nd here.

Mayweathers the most skilled of all time.

[jrosales13]

Hitting and not getting hit would be a decent premise.

No,

the decent premise is....

Skill is something you learn not born with. Talent is something you're born with. God Giving talent

[Tamis!]

Hitting and not getting hit would be a decent premise.

That's the science, not a measure of skill.

Now how does someone measure a boxer's skill?