What was worse for boxing?

**Kakutogi-Gumi** · 08-29-2010, 03:07 AM

Easy.

Floyd's foray in WWE.

**southcentralcar** · 08-29-2010, 03:12 AM

Originally posted by Crazylegs77

Vote, comment..

once again exposing mayweather haters. when mayweather was fighitng that fat slob every wwe fanboy googled who mayweather was. now do you think toney vs couture has any chance of bringing new fans to boxing ?

**Toney Loc** · 08-29-2010, 03:17 AM

That fight should've been a NC, dude was KOd after the bell.

**minasyan** · 08-29-2010, 03:21 AM

ahhaha i dont care for both and i dont think its hurt the sport at all

**_original_** · 08-29-2010, 03:23 AM

fat boy Toney was worse

at least Floyd "won" LOL

**Darkstar** · 08-29-2010, 03:27 AM

Toney will hurt more imo. But anyone who really follows boxing, knows Toney was old, fat, and 100% shot.

**Tobi.G** · 08-29-2010, 03:30 AM

Of course Toney was worse in his shamefull loss to Couture.
Mayweathers WWE thing was not bad at all. I think it was pretty cool.

**THEDOC** · 08-29-2010, 03:31 AM

the thing that hurts boxing more is fights like Mayweather v Pacquiao not happening. That's what REALLy hurts boxing.

**k4g4ng** · 08-29-2010, 04:49 AM

what is worse for boxing is that when a boxer who claims to be the greatest of all time refused to fight a one dimensional, no defense, B grade (according to his fans) midget fighter

What was worse for boxing?