Do You Enjoy Watching Ivan Calderon Fight?

[Perfect Plex]

???
???
???

[jri9d0]

Hey I enjoy when boxers put on a good boxing clinic on their opponents, they don't call it the "sweet science" for nothing.

[PACnPBFsuck]

???
???
???

I enjoy it, just because he still uses the art of Boxing, not what most of these boxers do now, who just go in the ring throw 700 punches and connect with 150 weak punches.

I appreciate pure boxers more than brawlers, it takes skill to outbox somebody for 8-12 rounds, there's no skill in knocking somebody out in 3 rounds, most of the time it's just luck.

[Junito-Rulez]

Dogs can fight, dogs can't box. Calderon is the best pure boxer in the game. Nobody can do what he does, i enjoy watching the best undefeated fighter in the world.

[007geyweather]

I enjoy it, just because he still uses the art of Boxing, not what most of these boxers do now, who just go in the ring throw 700 punches and connect with 150 weak punches.

I appreciate pure boxers more than brawlers, it takes skill to outbox somebody for 8-12 rounds, there's no skill in knocking somebody out in 3 rounds, most of the time it's just luck.

I'm not here to argue but if you think tyson is a no skill just because he knock's ppl out so easy doesnt me it was just luck. Succesful brawlers didn't get up there with just luck. Look at pacquiao now, he was a brawler and ppl think there is no science in it. If you look at Pacquiao's knock out to Hatton, if you study it Pacquiao actually did it a few times and the final one landed. That wasn't luck, he studied hatton and executed it. You can't call that no skills.

[007geyweather]

But for the question above, Calderon is boring just like floyd but it doesnt mean they are not good. They are good at what they do but it's just not pleasing to most ppl.

[baracuda]

he's great and all but no i dont!

[Guest]

Calderon is a fantastic boxer. I like seeing the short short ****er school dudes bigger and supposedly badder than him.

[PACnPBFsuck]

I'm not here to argue but if you think tyson is a no skill just because he knock's ppl out so easy doesnt me it was just luck. Succesful brawlers didn't get up there with just luck. Look at pacquiao now, he was a brawler and ppl think there is no science in it. If you look at Pacquiao's knock out to Hatton, if you study it Pacquiao actually did it a few times and the final one landed. That wasn't luck, he studied hatton and executed it. You can't call that no skills.

Tyson is a Heavyweight, if you're a heavyweight with KO % of 20%, you won't make it in that division. They're all heavy handed and huge, when anyone watches those guys we expect a knockout.

Look at the fights when Tyson had to go past the 5th round, it was like night and day, all of tyson's skills were between the 1st to 4th round, after that you're chances went up.

If you watch most of Pac's power punches he has his head down, look at the punch when he hit Hatton, where's Pac looking? down.

The thing is that most people would rather watch to guys throw unlimited punches at each other hoping one punch connects than watching a man outbox another man with pure tecnuiqe.

[mathed]

Dogs can fight, dogs can't box. Calderon is the best pure boxer in the game. Nobody can do what he does, i enjoy watching the best undefeated fighter in the world.

This...dude makes Mayweather look weak. Calderon has the slickest style out there and he does it tight for 12 rds, he has awesome skills.