Manny Pacquiao : Are We Asking the Right Questions?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • led
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 7933
    • 2,306
    • 2,762
    • 30,375

    #11
    Originally posted by IMDAZED
    The issue should have been resolved a long time ago. Manny has no one but himself to blame. Not that I pity him; anyone with half a brain can see what's going on.
    there is a question in this article: how does boxing address PED’s across the board?

    will peds be still around when pac retires?

    Comment

    • IMDAZED
      Fair but Firm
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 42644
      • 1,134
      • 1,770
      • 67,152

      #12
      Originally posted by led
      there is a question in this article: how does boxing address PED’s across the board?

      will peds be still around when pac retires?
      Of course. You strike while the iron's hot. And the issue is on the table now - as much as Pac would like for it to disappear. So everyone's gotta get on the bandwagon. Reporters have to start asking the tough questions and writing the tough articles - doing their research as the whistleblowers. Fans need to put aside ****** biases and recognize that the testing is for the greater good. DEMAND IT.

      Comment

      • TRAV1$
        Into the sunset, cousins
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jul 2010
        • 5503
        • 201
        • 199
        • 12,248

        #13
        Originally posted by led
        there is a question in this article: how does boxing address PED’s across the board?

        will peds be still around when pac retires?
        It could be that the problem is so deep rooted the organizations running the sports don't want to risk unveiling all
        It wouldn't be impossible for Top Rank or Golden Boy to start testing their fighters or the WBC testing it's champiuons, but would they really want to do it?
        Last edited by TRAV1$; 08-26-2010, 08:47 AM.

        Comment

        • IMDAZED
          Fair but Firm
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 42644
          • 1,134
          • 1,770
          • 67,152

          #14
          Originally posted by TRAV1$
          It could be that the problem is so deep rooted the organizations running the sports don't want to risk unveiling all.
          That is the problem. And the commissions and sanctioning bodies are willing to look the other way because they are afraid that if they become proponents of tougher testing, promoters like Arum will just take their fighter to another state. It's blackmail really. The commissions lost their spine ages ago - if they ever had one.

          Comment

          • led
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2010
            • 7933
            • 2,306
            • 2,762
            • 30,375

            #15
            Originally posted by IMDAZED
            Of course. You strike while the iron's hot. And the issue is on the table now - as much as Pac would like for it to disappear. So everyone's gotta get on the bandwagon. Reporters have to start asking the tough questions and writing the tough articles - doing their research as the whistleblowers. Fans need to put aside ****** biases and recognize that the testing is for the greater good. DEMAND IT.
            the problem with the fans are these biased and double standard thing. you know what i mean.

            Comment

            • TRAV1$
              Into the sunset, cousins
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jul 2010
              • 5503
              • 201
              • 199
              • 12,248

              #16
              If they wanted to do it properly, the tests would have to be random
              If it's true that HGH can be out of the system in weeks, then a fighter could make sure he was clean before going to be tested
              That's what was so ****** about Mosley and Mayweather doing the tests before their fight, I'm not saying that either are using any sort of PED, but they could have come off it months before the fight.

              Comment

              • IMDAZED
                Fair but Firm
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2006
                • 42644
                • 1,134
                • 1,770
                • 67,152

                #17
                Originally posted by led
                the problem with the fans are these biased and double standard thing. you know what i mean.
                Well now is not the time to be biased. Everyone should take the tests. Granted, as costly as it is, it will be limited to only a few fights early on. Only guys like Mayweather & Pacquiao can really afford to do it across the board. That's where the fans should be slapping them daily if they refuse to take the tests. Further, testing NEVER starts across the board. It always begins with a fight here, a fight there, etc. That's how it gathers steam. In this case, Top Rank tried to kill the issue before it started. That shouldn't have come as a surprise. Watching the media show their lack of cojones did, however.

                Comment

                • hugh grant
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 30553
                  • 2,201
                  • 930
                  • 105,596

                  #18
                  I really hate how *****s try not give pac any credit for his wins over, DLH, Cotto, Hatton, CLottey making out as if they were nothing.
                  ANd then accuse Pac of being on roids? What did he do that so impressed you that makes you accuse him of roids?

                  Beating Hatton, Cotto, CLottey must have been more remarkable than pac critics will admit.

                  Comment

                  • IMDAZED
                    Fair but Firm
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2006
                    • 42644
                    • 1,134
                    • 1,770
                    • 67,152

                    #19
                    Originally posted by hugh grant
                    I really hate how *****s try not give pac any credit for his wins over, DLH, Cotto, Hatton, CLottey making out as if they were nothing.
                    ANd then accuse Pac of being on roids? What did he do that so impressed you that makes you accuse him of roids?

                    Beating Hatton, Cotto, CLottey must have been more remarkable than pac critics will admit.
                    Wrong thread. Please leave.

                    Comment

                    • KlownvonnomaD
                      Contender
                      • Jun 2010
                      • 209
                      • 1
                      • 0
                      • 6,301

                      #20
                      My opinion is that at least 50% of all pro athletes would be using them if they thought they could get away with it (well it's probably more than that, but let's pretend for one moment that sport isn't a billion £/$ buisiness and people are doing it just for the love).

                      And guess what boxing isn't openly doing anything about it, so as far as I'm concerned their are bound to be afew boxers out there using stuff they shouldnt, whether on purpose on or accidently in suplements.

                      I'm hoping that Pac isn't one of them as that'll blow any chance of a mega fight happening, but if him being openly tested opens the door to more athletes/boxers getting tested then it has to be a good thing.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP